Problems of Victimization of the Injured Party at the Trial Stage

Authors

  • Anzor Makharadze

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60131/jlaw.1.2025.9285

Keywords:

Victimization of the Injured Party During the Judicial Review Stage, Consequences of Providing False Information and False Evidence, Admissibility of the Victim's Role and Related Important Issues.

Abstract

To ensure the restoration of the victim's violated rights, a legal mechanism must be established that enables their active participation in the justice process and provides the protection of their legitimate interests.

Protecting the rights and interests of natural and legal persons affected by crime is one of the fundamental responsibilities of a legal state.

This paper examines the issue of victimization of the injured party during the judicial review stage. It analyzes the specific features of the implementation of victims' rights as defined by legislation, the strengthening of those rights, and approaches to addressing the imbalance of power between victims and law enforcement authorities. Particular attention is given to challenges arising from the provision of false information or false evidence by victims, as well as the comprehensive phenomenon of victimization. The article also addresses judicial errors and the evolving legal status of the victim in criminal proceedings.

Author Biography

Anzor Makharadze

PhD Student at the Faculty of Law of Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University; Assistant at the Faculty of Law and Social Sciences of Shota Rustaveli State University, Batumi.

References

Turava M., Criminal Law, General Part Overview, Ninth Edition, Tbilisi, 2013, 337-339. (in Georgian)

Shalikashvili M. Criminology, Third Edition, Tbilisi, 2017, 194-199. (in Georgian)

Shalikashvili M., Tandilashvili Kh., Bakhtadze U., Victimization Science, Science on Crime Victims, Second Filled and Recycled Edition, Sulkhan-Saba Orbeliani University Publishing, Tbilisi, 2023, 48-61. (in Georgian)

Tsulaia Z., Criminology, General and Private Part, Tbilisi, 2005, 127. (in Georgian)

Anderson M., The Legacy of the Prompt Complaint Requirement, Corroboration Requirement, and Cautionary Instructions on Campus Sexual Assault, Boston University Law Review 84, 2004, 984–986.

Burgess A., Hazelwood R., The Victim's Perspective, In Practical Aspects of Rape Investigation: A Multidisciplinary Approach, 3rd ed., edited by Hazelwood R. and Burgess A., Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2001, 29–46.

Epstein J., True Lies: The Constitutional and Evidentiary Bases for Admitting Prior False Accusation Evidence in Sexual Assault Prosecutions, Quinnipiac Law Review No. 24, 2006, 609–658.

Gruber A., Victim Wrongs: The Case for a General Criminal Defense Based on Wrongful Victim Behavior in an Era of Victims' Rights, Temple Law Review, No. 76, Winter, 2003, 654–657.

Guthrie C., Rachlinski J., Wistrich A., Blinking on the Bench: How Judges Decide Cases, Cornell Law Review No. 93, 2007, 43.

McGrath M., False Allegations of Rape and the Criminal Profiler, The Journal of Behavioral Profiling 1, No. 3., 2000, 87.

Murphy P., Murphy on Evidence, 10th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008, 109.

Myers B., Green E., The Prejudicial Nature of Victim Impact Statements, Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, Vol. 10, 2004, 492–511.

Pokorak J., Rape Victims and Prosecutors: The Inevitable Ethical Conflict of De Facto Client/Attorney Relationships, South Texas Law Review, Spring, No. 48, 2007, 697–699.

Rock P., Theoretical Perspectives on Victimization, In Handbook on Victims and Victimology, edited by S. Walklate, Portland, OR: Willian Publishing, 2007, 42.

Schafer S., The Victim and His Criminal: A Study in Functional Responsibility, New York: Random House, 1968, 55.

Simmons R., Private Criminal Justice, Wake Forest Law Review No. 47, Winter, 2007, 315.

Turvey B., Criminal Profiling, An Introduction to Behavioral Evidence Analysis, 3rd ed, San Diego: Elsevier Science, 2008, 285.

Turvey B., Petherick W., Forensic Victimology, Examining Violent Crime Victims in Investigative and Legal Contexts, Amsterdam – London, 2009, 34, 37, 38, 39, 49, 50, 51, 271-272, 267, 272, 277-278, 278-279, 281-282, 282, 476, 477-478, 478, 190, 482, 483, 485-486, 165, 169, 172, 176, 184, 196, 200, 226, 510, 533, 524, 535.

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Makharadze, A. (2025). Problems of Victimization of the Injured Party at the Trial Stage. Journal of Law , (1), 334–349 (Geo) 243. https://doi.org/10.60131/jlaw.1.2025.9285

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.