Provisional Measures in the Practice of European Court of Justice and European Court of Human Rights
Keywords:
Provisional Measure, Interim Measure, Regulation, the Right to Fair Trial, European Court of Justice, European Court of Human Rights.Abstract
Due to the Association Agreement between Georgia and the European Union and the diversification of trade relations, it is important to actively harmonize Georgian civil procedural legislation with the EU Civil Procedure Law. For this purpose, it is interesting to review the definitions of the European Court of Justice on the issues related to the recognition and enforcement of the provisional measures.
The role of the institute of provisional measure is great because the enforcement is an integral part of the fair trial. There are cases of adoption of provisional measures, cancellation of provisional measures and the denial of the provisional measures in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. It is important to review the precedential decisions and the special definitions related to the provisional measures. In case the state submits a unilateral guarantee, the European Court of Human Rights shall cancel the provisional measure.References
Burduli N., Are Diplomatic Assurances Effective Guarantees against Torture, Journal of Law, №2, 2014.
Lakerbaia T., The Right of Withdrawal: Comparative Analyze of the Georgian and the European Contract Law, Dissertation Thesis, 2016 http://press.tsu.ge/data/image_db_innova/di¬sertaciebi_samar¬tali/tamar_la-kerbaia.pdf, [21.03.2018] (In Georgian).
Comparative Analysis of the Practice and Precautionary Measures Among International Human Rights Bodies, Submitted to Special Meeting of the Permanent Council of the Organization of American States by the Center for Justice and International Law (CEJIL) and International Human Rights Law Clinic, University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, Berkeley, California, United States of America, December 2012, 2. https://www.law.berkeley.edu/files/IHRLC/Precautionary_Measures_Research_Paper_(FINAL)_121210.pdf, 12.02.2018.
Judr. Kolban P., Mgr. Babickova K., Mgr. Potucky J., Selected Problems Related to Provisional Measures within Brussels Ibis Regulation and European Court on Human Rights, THEMIS competition – 2017. http://www.ejtn.eu/Documents/Team%20CZ%20semi%20final%20C.pdf, [24.03.2018].
Naldi G. J., Interim Measures in the UN Human Rights Committee, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2004, 53(2), 445-454.
van Rhee C.H., Smits J.M. (ed.), Civil Procedure, Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Cheltenham etc., 2006, 120. http://tcpbckup1.yolasite.com/resources/Elgar%20Encyclopedia%20of%20Comparative%20Law¬%20By-%20Jan%20M%20Smits.pdf, [22.03.2018].
Remiche A., Yordanova and Others v. Bulgaria: The Influence of the Social Right to Adequate Housing on the Interpretation of the Civil Right to Respect for One's Home (December 22, 2012). Human Rights Law Review, 2012, Vol. 12 (4), 792, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2705714, [25.02.2018].
Rozalinova E., Angelov A., Georgiev I., Jurisdiction, Recognition and Enforcement of Provisional and Protective Measures (International Cooperation in Civil Matters) (2012), Revista Forumul Judecatorilor, No. 4, 2012, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2224223, [12.03.2018].
Westberg P., Interim Measures and Civil Litigation, Scandinavian Studies in Law, 538. http://www.scan-dinavianlaw.se/pdf/51-25.pdf , [21.03.2018].
Worster W. Th., Unilateral Diplomatic Assurances as an Alternative to Provisional Measures (July 17, 2015). Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2016, https://ssrn.com/ab-stract=2632159 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2632159, [12.02.2018] .
Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters.
Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 December 2003 on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Matrimonial Matters and the Matters of Parental Responsibility.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on the Service in the Member States of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil and Commercial Matters (Service of Documents).
Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 of 28 May 2001 on Cooperation between the Courts of the Member States in the Taking of Evidences in Civil and Commercial Matters.
Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 on Insolvency Proceedings.
Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters.
ECJ, Judgment of 27 March 1979 Jacques de Cavel vs. Luise de Cavel, Case 143/78, ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:1979:83.
ECJ, Judgment of the 17 November 1998, Van Uden Maritime BV, Trading as Van Uden Africa Line v Kommanditgesellschaft in Firma Deco-Line and Another, Case C-391/95. ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:1998:543.
ECJ, Judgment of the Court of 27 April 1999,Hans-Hermann Mietz v Intership Yachting Sneek BV, Case C-99/96, ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:1999:202.
ECJ Judgment of 28 April 2005 St. Paul Dairy Industries NV vs. Unibel Exser BVBA, Case C-104/03, ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2005:255.
ECJ, Judgment of 12 July 2012, Solvay SA v Honeywell Flourine Products Europe BV, Honeywell Belgium NV, Honeywell Europe NV, c-616/10..
http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/FS_Interim_measures_ENG.pdf, [25.02.2018]..
http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Rules_Court_ENG.pdf, [25.02.2018]..
http://www.pict-pcti.org/matrix/discussion/echr/echr_interim.htm, [25.02.2018]..
http://www.refworld.org/cases,ECHR,3ae6b6fe14.html, [25.02.2018]..
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng-press{"itemid":["003-2226998-2371975"]}, [25.02.2018]..
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{"itemid":["003-3808707-4365533"]}, [25.02.2018]..
https://www.ecre.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/RULE-39-RESEARCH_FINAL.pdf , [12.02.2018]..
The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and the Fundamental Freedoms, see. http://www.su-premecourt.ge/files/upload-file/pdf/aqtebi5.pdf, [25.02.2018].
JSC ,,Sakgazi’’ and ,,Anajgupi’’ v. Parliament of Georgia, Judgment №1/14/184,228, July 28, 2005, Con-stitutional Court of Georgia, II-4 (In Georgian).
,, Broadcasting Company Rustavi 2,, Ltd and ,,TV Company Georgia’’ Ltd v. The Parliament of Georgia, N1/5/675.681, Sept. 30, 2016, The Constitutional Court of Georgia, II-52 (In Georgian).
Judgment, case N2/B-209-16, March 30, 2016, Kutaisi Court of Appeal (In Georgian).
Judgment, case N2/B-352-2013, May 8, 2013, Kutaisi Court of Appeal (In Georgian).
Judgment, case N2/761-2015, §2.5, March 26, 2015, Batumi City Court.
Judgment, case N1272780-16, March 9, 2016, Tbilisi Court of Appeal (In Georgian).
Judgment, case N1272780-16, March 9, 2016, Tbilisi Court of Appeal (In Georgian).
Akashev v. Russia, no 30616/05, §22, 1 June 2008.
Alzery v. Sweden, Comm. No. 1416/2005, par. 4.11, UN Doc.CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 available at http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/undocs/1416-2005.html, [25.02.2018].
Antonetto v. Italy, no. 15918/89, §28, 20 July 2000.
Apostol v Georgia, Judgment no 40765/02.
Dadiani and Machabeli v Georgia, Judgment 8252/08, Sept, 12, 2012, §44,http://www.supre¬me-court.ge/files/upload-file/pdf/dadiani,machabeli.pdf, [21.03.2018].
Hornsby v Greece, no. 18357/91, §40, 19 March 1997.
Kosmidis and Kosmidou v. Greece, no. 32141/04, §24, 8 November 2007. Rompoti and Rompotis v. Greece, no. 14263/04, §26, 25 January 2007.
Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"itemid":["001-68183"]}, [25.02.2018].
Othman (2007) S.I.A.C. No. SC/15/2005, http://siac.decisions.tribunals.gov.uk/Documents/QA¬TA¬DA_-FINAL_7FEB2007.pdf, [25.02.2018].
Othman (Abu Qatada) v. The United Kingdom, §287, no. 8139/09, 09 May 2012.
Rustavi 2 Broadcasting Company Ltd v. Georgia, Application no. 16812/17.
Sokur v. Ukraine, no. 29439/02, 26 April 2005, and Kryshchuk v. Ukraine no. 1811/06, 19 February 2009.
“Iza” Ltd and Makrakhidze v. Georgia, №28537/02, Sept. 27, 2005, European Court of Human Rights Judgments v. Georgia, The Supreme Court of Georgia Human Rights Centre, 2010, 57. http://www.su¬pre-mecourt.ge/files/upload-file/pdf/krebuli-saqartvelos-saqmeebze.pdf, [21.03.2018] (In Georgian).
Yordanova v Bulgaria appl. no. 25446/06, Judgement, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"itemid":["002-2155"]}, [25.02.2018].
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 TSU Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
