Practical Aspects of a Plea Agreement (bargaining)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60131/jlaw.1.2023.7072Keywords:
Plea Agreement, guilty plea, fair trial, standard of proof, appeal.Abstract
In the modern world of negotiations, it is increasingly important to talk about the perfection and renewal of a plea agreement as a speedy justice in the criminal process.
The purpose of the presented work is to discuss and analyze the main essential features of a plea agreement based on the current legislation, existing domestic judicial practice, approaches of the European Court and the experience of foreign countries (mostly, the USA), which contribute to the enhancement of proposals for legislative or practical improvement due to the relevant conclusions.
The paper reviews such topical issues as: the guilty plea as the subject and basis of a plea agreement and the ratio of benefits gained in exchange for it; Participation of parties in a plea agreement and the analysis of their comparison with the concept of a party qualified to take part in the process; A motion to approve a plea agreement as the main formal basis for a mistrial; The place and role of the so-called "plea agreement standard" in the system of proof standards; The exceptional rule provided by Article 55 of the Criminal Code of Georgia and the issue regarding the independence of the judge during the selection/appointment of the type of punishment; Consideration of the motion for approval of a plea agreement and features of the appeal results (current issues of legislation and judicial practice).
As a conclusion, at the end of the paper, the author proposes the opinion on the main problematic aspects, and offers the following summary: at the current stage, it could not be appropriate to introduce changes about increasing the competence of the judge to determine the punishment in the first provisions of a plea agreement of the Criminal Procedure Code of Georgia; It is pertinent to develop the interpretation of the legal regulation and judicial practice in the direction of defining only beyond a reasonable doubt standard as a single standard for establishing a guilty verdict.; It is appropriate to refine the legal regulations and establish a new judicial practice of the prosecutor's appeal of the verdict on the approval of a plea agreement, and it is proposed to recommend that such a case should be considered as a revision of the verdict due to newly discovered circumstances and that the prosecutor exercise the mentioned competence on the basis of a motion.
References
Criminal Procedure Code of Georgia, Legislative Herald of Georgia, 09/10/2009.
Law of Georgia "Juvenile Justice Code", Legislative Herald of Georgia, 12/06/2015.
Criminal Code of Georgia, Legislative Herald of Georgia, 22/07/1999.
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Title IV: Arraignment and Preparation for Trial, Rule 11 Rule 11. Pleas | Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute, https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_11 [23.05.2023].
Activity Report of the Prosecutor's Office of Georgia 2021, 21, (in Georgian), Microsoft Word - ad7e-f55d-3189-23ba.docx (pog.gov.ge) [23.05.2023].
Alge D., Negotiated Plea Agreements in Cases of Serious and Complex Fraud in England and Wales: A New Conceptualisation of Plea Bargaining?", Vo. 19, No.1, 2013, 1-18.
Bartels L., Wren E., “Guilty Your Honor”: Recent Legislative Developments on the Guilty Plea Discount and an Australian Capital Territory Case Study on it’s Operation, Adelaide Law Review, 2014, 361-384.
Chomakhashvili K., Legal Aid in Plea Bargaining. Overview of Georgian Legislation and Practice, UNDP, 2018 UNDP_GE_DG_Legal-Aid-in-Plea-Bargaining---Georgian-Legislation-and-Practice-Eng.pdf [23.05.2023].
Coalition for Independent and Transparent Justice. The report of criminal justice working group, the use of plea agreements in Georgia, 2013, 19-21 Use of Plea Agreements in Georgia (coalition.ge) (in Georgian) [23.05.2023].
Coercive Plea Bargaining, Policy Forum, Cato Institute, 2018, October https://www.cato.org/events/coercive-plea-bargaining
Chomakhashvili K., Legal Aid in Plea Bargaining. Overview of Georgian Legislation and Practice, UNDP, 2018.
Dan-Cohen M., Article: Decision Rules and Conduct Rules: On Acoustic Separation in Criminal Law, Vol. 97, Harv. L. Rev. 625, January, 1984.
Ellis A., Bussert T., Stemming the Tide of Postconviction Waivers, Published in Criminal Justice, Vol. 25, Number 1, 2010, American Bar Association.
Fisher T., The Boundaries of Plea Bargaining: Negotiating the Standard of Proof, Vol. 97, Issue 4, J. Crim. L. & Criminology 943, 2006-2007.
Fountain E., Adolescent Plea Bargains: Developmental and Contextual Influences of Plea Bargain Decision Making, Washington, D.C., Georgetown University, 2017.
Giorgadze G. (ed.), Commentary on the Criminal Procedure Code of Georgia, Tbilisi, 2015, 642, 645 (in Georgian).
Judgments issued by the European Court of Human Rights against Georgia (2005-2019), collection, Georgian Bar Association, 65-67, https://gba.ge/pdf/5fc637491ddeb.pdf/Final%20-%20ECtHR.pdf [23.05.2023].
Laliashvili T., Problems of the Plea Agreement in Relation to the Main Principles of the Criminal Process, In the textbook: The Impact of European and International Law on Georgian Criminal Procedural Law, Tumanishvili G., Jishkariani B., Shrami E. (eds.), Pubishing House „Meridian“, Tbilisi, 2019, 363-379, (in Georgian).
Mezzetti C., Baker S., Prosecutorial Resources, Plea Bargaining and the Decision to Go to Trial, Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 2001, Vol.17. No.1.
Langer M., From Legal Transplants to Legal Translations: The Globalization of Plea Bargaining and the Americanization Thesis in Criminal Procedure, Harvard International Law Journal, 45(1), 2004.
Neily C., Overcriminalization and Plea Bargaining Make Criminal Justice Like Shooting Fish in a Barrel, Cato Unbound, A Journal of Debate, July, 2020.
Okhanashvili A., Surmava B., Georgian Model of a Plea Agreement in Light of the Secision of the European Court of Human Rights: the case of Natsvlishvili and Togonidze against Georgia #9043/05, German-Georgian Journal of Criminal Law, 2021, #1 (in Georgian).
Paciocco P., Seeking Justice by Plea: The Prosecutor’s Ethical Obligations During Plea Bargaining, McGill Law Journal, 2018 CanLIIDocs 324, 45.
Redlich A.D., Summers A., Voluntary, Knowing, and Intelligent Pleas: Understanding the Plea Inquiry, Psychology Public Policy and Law, 18(4), 2011.
Report of the Chief Prosecutor of Georgia, 2018, Report of the Chief Prosecutor of Georgia, 14 (in Georgian) Multimedia/Files/ანგარიში/მთავარი პროკურორის ანგარიში 6.02.2018.pdf (pc.gov.ge) [23.05.2023].
Roberts J., Effective Plea Bargaining Councel, The Yale Law Journal, 2013, 2650-2674.
Thomas Ph.A., Plea Bargaining in England, 69 J. Crim. L. & Criminology, 1978, 170-178;
Tinsley A., Criminal Legal Aid and Plea-Bargaining (Overview of International Standards and Recommendations for Georgian Legal Aid), UNDP, 2017, 11-17.
Turava M., Criminal Law, Overview of the General part, 9th ed., Meridiani, Tbilisi, 2013, 362.
Turner J.L., Plea Bargaining and Disclosure in Germany and the United States: Comparative Lessons, Plea Bargaining Regulation: The Next Criminal Procedure Frontier Symposium, William and Mary Law Review, Vol. 57, Issue 4, 2016, 1549-1596.
Transparency International - Georgia, Report: Plea Bargaining in Georgia, 2010, 36 Plea Bargaining in Georgia - Negotiated Justice - GEO (2).pdf (transparency.ge) [23.05.2023].
Transparency International Georgia, Research: Plea Bargaining in Georgia, 2010, 15, 21 (in Georgian).
Tskitishvili T., Separate Aspects of Regulating the Issues of Substantive Criminal Law Issues of Juvenile Justice, TSU Journal of Law, 2019, #1, 190-221 (in Georgian).
Tsur Y., Bounding Reasonable Doubt: Implications for Plea Bargaining, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, September, 2016.
Vardzelashvili I., Some Issues of Sentencing (Analysis of Judicial Practice), SEU, Tbilisi, 2020, 13, (in Georgian).
Wolfson R. (ed.), American Bar Association Rule of Law Initiative (ABA/ROLI), A Guide for Lawyers in a Plea Agreement and Negotiation Skills, Author Group, Meridian, Tbilisi, 2013, 128-133 (in Georgian).
Judgment of the Chamber for criminal cases the Tbilisi Court of Appeal of June 25, 2013, case # 1/b155-13.
Judgment of Mtskheta District Court of June 27, 2016 on criminal case #1/156-16.
Ruling of the Chamber for criminal cases of the Supreme Court of Georgia of December 10, 2018 (Case #416AP-18), 58-64.
Verdict of the Chamber for criminal cases of the Supreme Court of Georgia of November 29, 2018, case #301 -18, 43-58.
Verdict of the Bolnisi District Court of April 15, 2020, case #N 1/110-20.
Natsvlishvili and Togonidze v. Georgia, [2014], (C) NATSVLISHVILI AND TOGONIDZE v. GEORGIA (coe.int) (in Georgian) [23.05.2023].
Kadagishvili v. Georgia [2020] (in Georgian) kadagishvili-saqartvelos-winaagmdeg.pdf (supremecourt.ge) [23.05.2023].
Scopolla v. Italy (No.2) [2009] ECHR, 135.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
