Privacy Protection of Juvenile in Conflict with the Law at the Trial

Authors

  • Tatia Kvrivishvili

Keywords:

არასრულწლოვანთა მართლმსაჯულება, კანონთან კონფლიქტში მყოფი არასრულწლოვანი, პირადი ცხოვრების უფლება, საქმის განხილვა დახურულ სასამართლო სხდომაზე, საქმის საჯარო განხილვის უფლება, არასრულწლოვნის საქმის სასამართლო.

Abstract

The present article refers to the issue of privacy of the juvenile in conflict with the law, in particular the rule of examination of the case in closed court hearings and the issue of restriction of attendees at the trial; What are the international standards in this regard, the practice of foreign countries and legislative regulation in Georgia. There is a separate chapter on the controversy surrounding two competitive rights: the right to a privacy of the juvenile and the right to a public hearing, reviewing case-law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Courts of Foreign Countries.

As the juvenile justice code of Georgia has strictly defined the procedure of considering the juvenile case behind closed doors without any exeption and restricted by the list of attendees, it will be analyzed on the basis of international practice research, whether this provision is always in the best interest of the juvenile and protects the juveniles' rights.

References

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Council of Europe, 1950.

Convention on the Rights of the Child, The United Nations, 20/11/1989.

United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice ("The Beijing Rules") Beijing rules, 1985, 29/11/1985.

UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC), General comment No. 10: Children's Rights in Juvenile Justice, Geneva, 2007.

Guidelines of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on child-friendly justice, 2010.

Criminal Procedure Code of Georgia, (annuelled 01/10/2010).

Criminal Procedure Code of Georgia, 09/10/2009.

Juvenile Justice Code of Georgia, 12/06/2015.

Georgia-EU Association Agenda, 2014.

Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz, GVG, 09/05/1975.

Jugendgerichtsgesetz (JGG), Bundesgesetz, Jugendgerichtsgesetz in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 11. Dezember 1974 (BGBl. I S. 3427), das zuletzt durch Artikel 4 des Gesetzes vom 27. August 2017 (BGBl. I S. 3295) geändert worden ist.

Guidelines of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on Child-friendly Justice, The Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, 2010.

Procedural Safeguards for Children Who Are Suspects or Accused Persons in Criminal Proceedings, The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, Directive (EU) 2016/800.

United Nations Guidelines on Justice in Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime (ECOSOC Res 2005/20), 2005.

Albrecht H., Youth Justice in Germany, Crime and Justice, Vol. 31, Youth Crime and Youth Justice: Comparative and Cross-National Perspectives, The University of Chicago Press Journals, 2004, 447.

American Bar Association (ABA) Division for Public Education, The History of Juvenile Justice, Dialogue on Youth and Justice, 2007.

Brunner R., Dölling D., Jugendgerichtsgesetz, Kommentar, 12. neu bearbeitate Aufl., 2011, 310.

Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, An EU Agenda for the Rights of the Child, 2011, 3.

Jancic O. C., The Rights of the Child in a Changing World, 25 years after the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, International Academy of Comparative Law, 2016, preface.

Doob A. N., Tonry M., Doob A. N., Tonry M., Varieties of Youth Justice, Crime and Justice, Vol. 31, Youth Crime and Youth Justice: Comparative and Cross-National Perspectives, Crime and Justice, The University of Chicago Press Journals, 2004, 3.

Dünkel F., Juvenile Justice Systems in Europe – Reform developments between justice, welfare and ‘new punitiveness’, Kriminologijos Studijos 2004-1, 32.

European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights and Council of Europe, Handbook on European Law Relating to the Rights of the Child, 2015, 17.

Grisso T., Juveniles’ waiver of rights, legal and psychological competence, New York, 1981, 2.

Greenebaum S. S., Conditional Access to Juvenile Court Proceedings: A Prior Restraint or a Viable Solution?, Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law, Vol. 44, 1993, 136, 140, 143, 161.

Hamilton C., Guidance for Legislative Reform on Juvenile Justice, Tbilisi, 2015, 88 (in Georgian).

Hopman M. J., (Why) Should children have rights? A philosophical perspective, The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (taking stock after 25 years and looking ahead), 2016, 272.

International Juvenile Justice Observatory, White Paper on the EU Directive 2016/800 on procedural safeguards for children who are suspects or accused persons in criminal proceedings. Key aspects, priorities and challenges for implementation in the EU Member States, 2016, 7.

Joint civil society position on the draft report of Caterina Chinnici on the proposal for a directive on procedural safeguards for children suspected or accused in criminal proceedings, 2014, 7.

Morris B., Davies M. M., Can children’s privacy rights be adequately protected through press regulation? What press regulation can learn from the courts, Journal of Media Law, Vol. 10, Issue 1, 2018, 101.

Manco E., Protecting the Child’s Right to Participate in Criminal Justice Proceedings (Commentary), Amsterdam Law Forum, 2016, 67.

Nijnatten C., ‘Behind Closed Door: Juvenile Hearings in the Netherlands’, International Journal of Law and the Family 3, 1989, 177.

Palmer E., Germany: Children’s Rights: International and National Laws and Practice, Law Library of Congress-94, 2007, 513.

Rap S., The Participation of Juvenile Defendants in the Youth Court A Comparative Study of Juvenile Justice Procedures in Europe, Utrecht, 2013, 37-38.

Shalikashvili M., Mikanadze G., Juvenile Justice (Handbook), Tbilisi, 2016, 86 (in Georgian).

Trasen J. L., Privacy v. Public Access to Juvenile Court Proceedings: Do closed Hearings Protect the Child or the System?”, Boston College Third World Law Journal, Vol. 15, Issue 2, 1995, 372-374 377-378.

Trechsel S., Human Rights in Criminal Proceedings, Tbilisi, 2009, 143-145 (in Georgian).

The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Access to Juvenile Courts, A reporters guide to proceedings & documents, 1999, 2.

Van Bueren G., A Commentary on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, Article 40 Child Criminal Justice, 2006, 22, 24.

JR 38, RE Application for Judicial Review, Northern Ireland, 2015.

In re Gault,, Supreme Court of U.S., No. 116, 1967.

Sutter v. Switzerland, ECHR, 8209/78, 1984.

T. & V. v. the United Kingdom, ECHR, 24888/94, 24724/94, 2000.

Re JR38 [2016] AC 1131.

Case T.R, the Supreme Court of Ohio, 1990.

U.S. v. L.M., 425 F.Supp.2d 948, N.D. Iowa 2006.

https://swarb.co.uk/jr38-re-application-for-judicial-review-northern-ireland-sc-1-jul-2015/.

https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/exceptions-confidentiality-juvenile-criminal-records.html.

https://germanlawarchive.iuscomp.org/?p=771#175.

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/387/1/.

https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/publiced/features/DYJpart1.authcheckdam.pdf.

Published

2019-06-30

How to Cite

Kvrivishvili, T. (2019). Privacy Protection of Juvenile in Conflict with the Law at the Trial. Journal of Law, (1). Retrieved from https://jlaw.tsu.ge/index.php/JLaw/article/view/2639

Issue

Section

Articles