The Preferential and Non-Preferential Rules for Determining Product Origin and Their Significance in International Trade Law

Authors

  • Marika Turava

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60131/jlaw.1.2025.9278

Keywords:

Free Trade, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Nationality, Protectionism, Substantial Transformation, Tariff Classification, Preferential Treatment.

Abstract

Rules of origin constitute a fundamental pillar of international trade law, serving to classify goods based on their origin (or “economic nationality”). These rules are crucial role to the functioning of free trade agreements, which grant significant tariff and non-tariff preferences to countries participating in a preferential trade regime (preferential rules of origin). Rules of origin are also essential for the implementation of various trade mechanisms, such as anti-dumping measures, quantitative restrictions (quotas), trade embargoes, labeling requirements, and safeguard measures (non-preferential rules of origin).

This article examines the legal framework of preferential and non-preferential rules of origin within the World Trade Organization (WTO). It explores the pivotal role that the rules of origin play in shaping the free trade dynamics and their impact on the trade policies of countries, in which these rules can act as a mechanism for protectionism, potentially becoming a "hidden weapon" that limits free trade and competition. The article also analyzes the practical challenges associated with the implementation of rules of origin in global trading regimes.

Author Biography

Marika Turava

Master of Laws (LL.M. Chicago, USA), PhD Student and Academic Assistant in Private Law at Faculty of Law of Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Visiting Researcher at the Faculty of Law of Heidelberg University.

References

Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part, 27/06/2014.

Agreement on a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) between Georgia and the European Union, 27/06/2014.

Resolution of the Parliament of Georgia No. 841 on accession to the International Convention on the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System, 23/12/2008.

Resolution of the Government of Georgia No. 453, "On Approval of the Criteria for Determining the Country of Origin of Goods, the Form of the Certificate of Origin, and the Procedure for Its Completion and Issuance", 16/09/2019.

Order of the Minister of Finance of Georgia No. 21, “On Approval of the National Commodity Nomenclature of Foreign Economic Activities (NCNO)”, 26/01/2024.

Agreement on Rules of Origin (ARO), Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, 15/04/1994.

General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, 15/04/1994.

International Convention on the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System, World Customs Organization, 1/01/1988.

Pan-Euro-Mediterranean Regional Convention on Preferential Origin, 26/03/2012.

Tokyo Round Agreements, Decision of the Contracting Parties of GATT on "Differential and More Favorable Treatment Reciprocity and Fuller Participation of Developing Countries", 28/11/1979.

Uruguay Round Agreements, Decision on "Measures in Favor of Least-Developed Countries", World Trade Organization, 15/04/1994.

Augier P., Gasiorek M., Lai Tong C., Martin P., Prat A., The Impact of Rules of Origin on Trade Flows, Economic Policy, Jul., 2005, Vol. 20, No. 43 (Jul., 2005), 567, 569-624.

Barcelo J.J., Harmonizing Preferential Rules of Origin in the WTO System (December 19, 2006), Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper no. 06-049.

Chase K. A, Protecting Free Trade: The Political Economy of Rules of Origin, International Organization, Summer, 2008, Vol. 62, No. 3 (Summer, 2008), 507-530.

Das R.U., Ratna R.S., Perspectives on Rules of Origin, 2011, First edition, Palgrave Macmillan.

De Wulf L., Sokol J.B., Customs Modernization Handbook, 2005.

Estevadeordal A., Suominen K., Rules of Origin in the World Trading System (2003).

Falvey R., Reed G., Economic Effects of Rules of Origin, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Band 134, H. 2 (1998), 209-229, Published by: Springer.

Forrester I.S., EEC Customs Law: Rules of Origin and Preferential Duty Treatment, Part I, Reprinted from European Law Review Vol. 5, No. 3. June 1980.

Gourdon J., Gourdon K., De Melo J., A (More) Systematic Exploration of the Trade Effect of Product-Specific Rules of Origin, World Trade Review (2023), 22, 421–435.

Harilal K.N., Beena P.L., Reining in Rules of Origin-Based Protectionism: A Critique of WTO Initiatives, Economic and Political Weekly 40, no. 51 (2005): 5419–5427.

Inama S., Rules of Origin in International Trade, 2022.

Krajewski M., Wirtschaftsvölkerrecht, 4. Auflage, 2017.

LaNasa J.A. III., An Evaluation of the Uses and Importance of Rules of Origin, and the Effectiveness of the Uruguay Round's Agreement on Rules of Origin in Harmonizing and Regulating Them (1995), Jean Monnet Working Paper.

LaNasa J.A. III., Rules of Origin and the Uruguay Round's Effectiveness in Harmonizing and Regulating Them, The American Journal of International Law, Oct., 1996, Vol. 90, No. 4 (Oct., 1996), 625-640.

Matsushita M., Schoenbaum T.J., Mavroidis P.C., Hahn M., The World Trade Organization Law, Practice, and Policy, Third edition, 2017.

Nell P.G., WTO Negotiations on the Harmonization of Rules of Origin, 33 (3) Journal of World Trade (1999), 45-71.

Satapathy C., Rules of Origin: A Necessary Evil?, Economic and Political Weekly, 1998, Vol. 33, No. 35 (1998), 2270-2271.

Simpson J.P., Rules of Origin in Transition: A Changing Environment and Prospects for Reform, Law and Policy in International Business 22, no. 4 (1991): 665-672.

Van den Bossche P., Zdouc W., The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization: Text, Cases, and Materials. 5th ed., Cambridge University Press, 2021.

Weiler J.H.H., Cho S., Feichtner I., Arato J., International and Regional Trade Law: The Law of the World Trade Organization, 2016.

Weiß W., Ohler C., Bungenberg M., Welthandelsrecht. 3. Auflage, 2022.

Kommerskollegium, Sweden, The Impact of Rules of Origin on Trade, 2012:1 – A Comparison of the EU's and the US's Rules for the Textile and Clothing Sector, National Board of Trade, March 2012.

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), Rules of Origin and Origin Procedures Applicable to Exports from Least Developed Countries, UNCTAD series, 2011, United Nations Publication.

World Customs Organization (WCO), Comparative Study on Preferential Rules of Origin, Version 2017, 20/06/2017.

World Customs Organization (WCO), Rules of Origin Handbook, 6/12/2012.

SDI Technologies, Inc. v. United States, 977 F.Supp. 1235 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1997), United States Court of International Trade.

Torrington Co. v. United States, 764 F.2d 1563 (Fed. Cir. 1985), United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Territory of Hawaii v. Harry MY Ho., No. 3078, 41 Haw. 565, 571 (1957).

United States v. Gibson-Thomsen Co., 27 CCPA 267 (1940).

Anheuser-Busch Ass'n v. United States, 207 U.S. 556, 562 (1908).

Hartranft v. Wiegman, 121 U.S. 609, 615 (1887).

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Turava, M. (2025). The Preferential and Non-Preferential Rules for Determining Product Origin and Their Significance in International Trade Law. Journal of Law , (1), 154–183 (Geo). https://doi.org/10.60131/jlaw.1.2025.9278

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.