Defining Non-Property Value within Personal Non-Property Rights in Civil Circulation

Authors

  • Nino Katamadze

Keywords:

personal; non-property; rights; economic; property; value; civil circulation.

Abstract

The respective article has been developed with regard to raising the challenge of
determining property value of the personal non-property rights and its applicability
toward fundamental, ideal (non-property) bases. For the sake of comprehensive access to
the legal problem – it is important to undertake systematic analyses of various conceptual
issues related to the respective challenge; it shall be further determined how much the
Georgian model/practice ensures the standard of trust toward protection of personal
non-property rights, which has been set forth among progressive legal orders and that
complies to all the requirements of the information epoque.
Various ideas have been identified throughout the doctrinal analysis with regard to
determining value of property in personal rights, which hinders formation of unified
judicial practice on the respective matter.
The research has been based on an analysis of legal doctrine and judicial practice.
The respective article demonstrates conceptual approaches of various legal systems and
peripeties of legal order of Georgia within comparative legal angle.

Author Biography

Nino Katamadze

Doctoral Student at the Faculty of Law, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University; Assistant at the
Sulkhan-Saba Orbeliani Teaching University; Invited Lecturer at the Ilia State University.

References

Civil Code of Georgia, Civil Code of Georgia, Parliamentary Gazettes, 31, 24/07/1997.

The Law of Georgia on Freedom of Speech and Expression, LHG, 19, 24/06/2004.

Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (BGB), 01/01/1900, https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_bgb/

12.2019].

Akhvlediani Z., Zoidze B., Ninidze T., Chanturia L., Jorbenadze S. (eds.), Comment of the Civil Code

of Georgia, Book I, General Provisions of the Civil Code, Tbilisi, 1999, 77 (in Georgian).

Alexander Ch., Schadenersatz und Abschöpfung im Lauterkeits-und Kartellrechts, Jena, 2010, 257.

Bamberger H., Roth H., Hau W., Poseck R., Beck’scher Online-Kommentar, §12, 46 Auf., München,

, Rn. 9.

Beuthien V., Schmölz A., Persönlichkeitsschutz durch Persönlichkeitsgüterrechte, München, 1999, 45.

Bichia M., The Georgian Model of Compensation of Non-property Damage for Violating Personal

Rights in Line with European Standards, Journal of Law, № 1, 2017, 9.

Chanturia L., General Section of Civil Law, Tbilisi, 2011, 199 (in Georgian).

Dreier Th., Kompensation und Prävention, Tübingen, 2002, 256.

Drobnig U., Kötz H., Mestmäcker E .-J., Deutsch-polnisches Kolloquium über Wirtschaftsrecht und

das Recht des Perönlichkeitsschutzes, Tübingen, 1985, 9.

Götting H., Schertz C., Seitz W., Handbuch des Persönlichkeitsrecht, Verlag C.H. Beck, München,

, 20-21, 196, 197, 656, 659, 1072, 1073, 1160, 1167, 1168.

N. Katamadze, Defining Non-Property Value within Personal Non-Property Rights in Civil Circulation

Götting H. P., Vom Right of Privacy zum Right of Publicity: Die Anerkennung eines

immaterialgütterrecht an der eigenen Person im amerikanischen Recht, GRUR Int. 1995, 656, 661,

Hartl M., Persönlichkeitsrechte als verkehrsfähige Vermögensgüter, Dissertation, Konstanz, 2004, 120

https://d-nb.info/975522981/34 [30.05.2019].

Heitmann L., Der Schutz der materiellen Interessen an der eigenen Persönlichkeitssphäre durch

subjektiv-private Rechte, Hamburg, 1963, 23.

Hubmann H., Das Persönlichkeitsrecht, Köln, 1967, 133.

Jorbenadze S., Comment of the Civil Code of Georgia, Book I, art.17, 18, Tbilisi, 2017, 99, 131 (in

Georgian).

Jorbenadze S., Social Media Law, Tbilisi, 2019, 63 (in Georgian).

Katamadze N., The Impact of Non-Property (Moral) Damage Functions on the Criteria for

Determining the Amount of Compensation, Journal of Law, № 1, 2018, 95.

Kereselidze D., Personal rights (analysis and conclusion), http://newvision.ge/ge/content/vi-vi-

პიროვნული-უფლებები-ანალიზი-და-დასკვნა [30.12.2019] (in Georgian).

Kereselidze D., The Most General Systemic Concepts of the Private Law, Institute of European and

Comparative Law, Tbilisi, 2009, 131 (in Georgian).

Klass N., in: Ermann M., Kommentar zum BGB, §12, 15. Aufl., Band I., 2017, Köln, Rn. 14.

Kläver M., Vermögenrechtliche Aspekte des zivilrechtlichen allgemeinen Persönlichkeitsrechts, ZUM

, 205.

Klüber R., Persönlichketsschutz und Kommerzialisierung, Tübingen, 2007, 14.

Peukert A., Persönlichkeitesbezogene Immaterialgütterrecht, 2000, Berlin, 3, 11.

Rehbinder M., Peukert A., Uhrheberrecht, 1 Teil, 18. Auf., München, 2018, Rn. 154, 155.

Rixecker R., in: Münchener Kommentar zum BGB, Allgeimeine Persönlichkeitsrecht, §12, Band 1, 7.

Aufl., München, 2018, Rn. 3, 35.

Sajaia L., Author’s Personal Non-Property Rights, thesis for acquiring PhD degree, TSU, Tbilisi,

, 21, 98, 93, 100, 116, 236 (in Georgian).

Ulmer U., Urheber-und Verlagsrecht, 3rd ed., Berlin, 1980, 116.

O'Brien v. Pabst Sales Co 124 F. 2d 167 (5th Cir. 1941

Gill v. Hearst Publishing Co., 40 Cal. 2nd 224, 253 (1953).

Healen Laboratories, Inc. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc.202 F. 2d 866 (2d Cir. 1953).

BGH GRUR 1956, 427, 428-Paul Dahlke.

Motschenbacher v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 498 F. 2d 821, 824 (9th Cir. 1974).

Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co433 U.S. 564 (1977).

BGH, NJW-RR 1987, 231 = LM § 812 BGB Nr. 187 = GRUR 1987, 128.

BGH GRUR 2000, 709- Marlene Dietrich.

BGH NJW 2000, 2195; 2000, 2201- Der blaue Engel.

The Supreme Court of Georgia, №3c/376-01, Decision, 18.07.2001.

The Supreme Court of Georgia, №3c/754-01, Decision, 5.12.2001.

The Supreme Court of Georgia, № AS-593-1241-03, Decision, 14.04.2004.

Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457.

Cass.Civ. 15.02.2005, D.2005. IR. 597.

TGI Lyon 17.12.1980, D.1981. J. 202; TGI Paris 28.9.2006.

Douglas v Hello! [2007]UKHL 21.

The Supreme Court of Georgia, №AS-1401-1526-04, Decision, 14.04.2005.

The Supreme Court of Georgia, №AS-370-352-2013, Decision, 8.11.2013.

The Supreme Court of Georgia, № AS-1084-1034-2014, Decision, 11.05.2015.

The Supreme Court of Georgia, № AS-1433-1531-04, Decision, 30.06.2015.

The Constitutional Court of Georgia, 1/4/592, October 24, 2015, decision on the case of “Citizen of

Georgia Beka Tsikarishvili v. the Parliament of Georgia”, II-1.

Published

2020-06-30

How to Cite

Nino Katamadze. (2020). Defining Non-Property Value within Personal Non-Property Rights in Civil Circulation. Journal of Law, (1). Retrieved from https://jlaw.tsu.ge/index.php/JLaw/article/view/2960

Issue

Section

Articles