Beyond Consent: Children’s Data Protection, Parental Power, and the Limits of Privacy in the Age of Sharenting

Authors

  • Salome Sigua Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60131/jlaw.2.2026.11924

Keywords:

Personal data protection; consent; sharenting; privacy; minors; parental responsibility; digital identity; regulation.

Abstract

The article critically examines the legal status of minors as data subjects within contemporary data protection frameworks, with a particular focus on the limitations of consent as the primary legal basis for processing children’s personal data. While instruments such as the General Data Protection Regulation establish enhanced safeguards for minors, the reliance on parental consent raises significant doctrinal and practical concerns, especially in digital environments shaped by asymmetries of power, information, and technological literacy.

The paper explores the concept of ,,sharenting” as a growing phenomenon that challenges traditional controller–data subject relationships, arguing that parents increasingly function as de facto data controllers of their children’s digital identities without corresponding regulatory accountability. By analysing international and regional legal instruments, including the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, as well as selected national approaches, the article highlights structural gaps in existing frameworks, particularly regarding consent verification, cross-border inconsistencies, and enforcement limitations.

The study further interrogates the tension between parental authority and the child’s independent right to privacy, especially in cases involving children of public figures, where reduced expectations of privacy may undermine effective protection. Drawing on empirical insights and comparative legal analysis, the article argues for a conceptual shift from a purely consent-driven model towards a responsibility-based and risk-oriented approach that better reflects the realities of children’s digital lives. It concludes by proposing that effective protection of minors’ personal data requires not only legal reform but also the reconfiguration of parental obligations within the broader data protection ecosystem.

In doing so, it contributes to the emerging debate on the need to reconceptualise children’s data protection beyond individual consent towards systemic accountability frameworks.

Author Biography

Salome Sigua, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University

Doctor of Law, Invited Lecturer at Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Faculty of Law

References

1. General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679, 27 April 2016.

2. Directive 2002/58/EC (Privacy and Electronic Communications Directive), 12 July 2002.

3. Proposal for a Regulation on Privacy and Electronic Communications (ePrivacy Regulation), repealing Directive 2002/58/EC.

4. Directive 2010/13/EU (Audiovisual Media Services Directive), 10 March 2010.

5. OECD Privacy Framework, 2013.

6. United Kingdom Data Protection Act 2018.

7. United Kingdom General Data Protection Regulation, 8 March 2023.

8. Digital Economy Act 2017 (UK), Part 3.

9. French Data Protection Act No. 78-17 of 6 January 1978.

10. German Federal Data Protection Act (BDSG), 30 June 2017.

11. Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), 1998.

12. UNICEF Policy on Personal Data Protection, Policy/DFAM /2020/001, 15 July 2020.

13. Georgian Law on Personal Data Protection, 14 June 2023 (in Georgian).

14. Georgian Law on Civil Service, 26 June 1997 (in Georgian).

15. Loi n° 78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés (France).

16. Bäcker M. et al., Datenschutz-Grundverordnung-BDSG: Kommentar, 4th ed., C.H. Beck, Munich, 2024, 2017–2022.

17. Baumann J. et al., Telekommunikation-Telemedien-Datenschutz-Gesetz Kommentar, C.H. Beck, Munich, 2023.

18. Centre for Information Policy Leadership, GDPR Implementation in Respect of Children’s Data and Consent, Hunton & Williams LLP, 2018.

19. Feiler L., Forgo N., Nebel M., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, 2nd ed., 2021.

20. Hof S. van der; Ouburg S. D., Methods for Obtaining Parental Consent and Maintaining Children’s Rights, Leiden University, 2021.

21. Lievens E. et al., The Child’s Right to Protection against Economic Exploitation in the Digital World, 2019.

22. Schofield M., GDPR Age of Consent Isn’t Child’s Play, <https://www.skillcast.com/blog/gdpr-age-consent-not-childs-play> [10.04.2026].

23. Siibak A., Lipu M., Take it Down!’: Estonian Parents’ and Pre-teens’ Opinions and Experiences with Sharenting, Media International Australia, 2019.

24. Sorensen S., “Protecting Children’s Right to Privacy in the Digital Age: Parents as Trustees of Children’s Rights, Children’s Legal Rights Journal, 36(3), 2016.

25. Steinberg S. B., Sharenting: Children’s Privacy in the Age of Social Media, University of Florida Levin College of Law, 2017.

26. Van der Maelen C., The Coming of Age of Technology: Emerging Tech for Online Verification, Delphi, 2019.

27. Wingerter I., Parent-Child Tort Immunity, Louisiana Law Review, 50, 1990.

28. Azar F. L., Hannah Arendt: The Right to Have Rights, Critical Legal Thinking, <https://criticallegalthinking.com> [10.04.2026].

29. Shudra T., Protection of Minors’ Personal Data in the Digital Environment under Divergent Expectations of Parents and Children, Journal of Personal Data Protection, No. 1, Tbilisi, 2023, 118 (in Georgian).

30. Protection of Minors’ Personal Data – Theory and Practice, Personal Data Protection Service, 2023, 72 (in Georgian).

31. Geoffrey Driver v. Crown Prosecution Service [2022] EWHC 2500 (KB).

32. N.TS. and Others v. Georgia, ECtHR, No. 71716/12, 2016.

33. Asociacion Profesional Elite Taxi v Uber Systems Spain SL, C-434/15, ECLI: EU: C: 2017:981.

34. Schwizgebel v. Switzerland, ECtHR, No. 25762/07, 2010.

35. Güveç v. Turkey, ECtHR, No. 70337/01, 2009.

36. <https://www.skillcast.com/blog/gdpr-age-consent-not-childs-play> [10.04.2026].

37. <https://criticallegalthinking.com/2019/07/12/hannah-arendt-right-to-have-rights/> [10.04.2026].

38. <https://www.cnil.fr/en/recommendation-7-check-age-child-and-parental-consent-while-respecting-childs-privacy> [10.04.2026].

39. <https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/sharenting> [10.04.2026].

Published

2026-07-11

How to Cite

Sigua, S. (2026). Beyond Consent: Children’s Data Protection, Parental Power, and the Limits of Privacy in the Age of Sharenting. Journal of Law , (1). https://doi.org/10.60131/jlaw.2.2026.11924

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.