The Ombudsman Institution – as an Alternative Grievance Mechanism in Relation to Matters of Public Administration

Authors

  • Tamar Gvaramadze

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48614/jlaw.2.2020.139-161

Keywords:

Public Defender of Georgia, ombudsman, public administration, alternative rights protection mechanism, public institutions, oversight of the protection of rights.

Abstract

In a democracy, human rights are guaranteed by the constitution of a state and protected by the judiciary. At the same time, alternative and/or quasi-judicial systems have an important role in the protection of human rights. The ombudsman institution is considered to be one of such alternative mechanisms in public law.

This article is the first attempt in the Georgian scientific literature to discuss, in the context of the practices of other countries and the Public Defender of Georgia, the characteristics of the mandate of the ombudsman as an alternative institution for the restoration of rights and its authority to examine the legality of the decisions made by the public institutions in relation to matters of public administration.

Author Biography

Tamar Gvaramadze

Doctor of Law, Associate Professor at Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Faculty of Law.

References

Constitution of Georgia, Departments of the Parliament of Georgia, 31-33, 24/08/1995.

Constitution of Georgia, adopted by the Constituent Assembly of Georgia, 21/02/1921.

Organic Law of Georgia “On the Public Defender of Georgia”, Departments of the Parliament of Georgia, 13, 07/06/1996.

Law of Georgia, “General Administrative Code of Georgia”, Legislative Herald of Georgia, 32(39), 15/07/1999.

The Code “On The Rights of the Child”, Website of LEPL Legislative Herald of Georgia, 27/09/2019.

Law of Georgia, “Administrative Offences Code of Georgia”, Article 1734, Departments of the High Council of the Georgian SSR, Appendix 12, 31/12/1984.

Law of Georgia “on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination”, Website of LEPL Legislative Herald of Georgia, 07/05/2014.

Law of Georgia, “On Business Ombudsman of Georgia”, Website of LEPL Legislative Herald of Georgia, 28/05/2015.

Order N82 of the Public Defender of Georgia, "On the Unified Rules of Procedure of the Office of the Public Defender of Georgia", 19/02/2016 http://www.ombudsman.ge/res/docs/2020091012450956360.pdf, [19.10.2020].

Resolution (77) 31, On the Protection of the Individual in relation to the Acts of Administrative Authorities, Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, 1977, https://rm.coe.int/09000016804dec56 [15.10.2020].

Resolution 1959 (2013), Strengthening the Institution of Ombudsman in Europe, Adopted by Parliamentary Assembly, 4 October 2013, 36th Sitting, https://pace.coe.int/en/files/20232/html [17.10.2020].

Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe R (85) 13 on the institution of the Ombudsman, https://rm.coe.int/0900001680506bee, [21.10.2020].

Recommendation CM/Rec(2019)6 of the Committee of Ministers to the Member States

on the Development of the Ombudsman institution, Adopted by the Committee of Ministers, 16 October, 2019 https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectId=090000168098392f [17.10.2020].

Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe R (97)14 on the establishment of independent national institutions for the promotion and protection of human rights, https://rm.coe.int/16804fecf5 [21.10.2020].

Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe R (2000)10 on codes of conduct for public officials, https://rm.coe.int/16806cc1ec [21.10.2020].

Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe CM/Rec(2007)7 on good administration, https://rm.coe.int/cmrec-2007-7-of-the-cm-to-ms-on-good-administration/16809f007c [21.10.2020].

Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe CM/Rec(2014)7 on the protection of whistle-blowers < https://rm.coe.int/16807096c7, [21.10.2020].

Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe CM/Rec(2016)3 on human rights and business https://rm.coe.int/human-rights-and-business-recommendation-cm-rec-2016-3-of-the-committe/16806f203, [21.10.2020].

Recommendations of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe 757 (1975), 1615 (2003), http://semantic-pace.net/?search=KjoqfGNhdGVnb3J5X3N0cl9lbjoiQWRvcHRlZCB0ZXh0Ig==&lang=en [21.10.2020].

Recommendations 61(1999), 159 (2004), 309(2011) and Resolution 327 (2011) of the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe, https://www.coe.int/en/web/congress/adopted-texts-by-type-of-documents [21.10.2020].

ECRI General Policy Recommendation No. 2: Equality bodies to combat racism and intolerance at national level, adopted on 7 December 2017, https://www.coe.int/en/web/european-commission-against-racism-and-intolerance/recommendation-no.2 [21.10.2020].

United Nations General Assembly Resolution 48/134 on the principles relating to the status of national institutions for the promotion and protection of human rights (“the Paris Principles”) of 20 December 1993 https://www.un.org/en/sections/general/documents/ [21.10.2020].

United Nations General Assembly Resolution 69/168 of 18 December 2014 and Resolution 72/186 of 19 December 2017 on the role of the Ombudsman, mediator and other national human rights institutions in the promotion and protection of human rights, https://www.un.org/en/sections/general/documents/ [21.10.2020].

United Nations General Assembly Resolution 72/181 of 19 December 2017 on National institutions for the promotion and protection of human rights, the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, adopted by the General Assembly on 18 December 2002, https://www.un.org/en/sections/general/documents/ [21.10.2020].

The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities adopted by the General Assembly on 13 December 2006 https://www.un.org/en/sections/general/documents/ [21.10.2020].

CDL-AD(2019)005-e, Principles on the Protection and Promotion of the Ombudsman Institution (The Venice Principles), Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 118th Plenary Session, Venice, 15-16 March 2019, <https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2019)005-e> [17.10.2020].

Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, Final Activity Report, Submitted to the Committee of Ministers, Strasbourg, 3 August 1977, 12-19, https://rm.coe.int/native/090000168051651e [15.10.2020].

Abedin N., Conceptual and Functional Diversity of the Ombudsman Institution: A Classification, Administration and Society, N43 (8), SAGE Publications, 2011, 899-903, 918-922, http://aas.sagepub.com [11.10.2020].

Batalli M., Role of Ombudsman Institution Over the Administration, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.2699061, 235-237, 239.

Diaw M. Ch., The Ombudsman story: A Case Study in Public Oversight, Natural Justice and State Transformation, 2007, 13, 17-18, 22, 35-36.

Elwood B., The Ombudsman and Good Governance, Occasional Paper, International Ombudsman Institute, #74, 2000, 2.

Elwood B., The Classical Ombudsman - an Effective Reviewer of Administrative Decisions by Government Agencies - A New Zeland Perspective, International Ombudsman Institute, N76, 2001, 2, 4-6, 8-9, 11-12.

Langen S. M., The Global Ombudsman, Presented at the 12th Winelands Conference on Public Leadership for Added Citizen Value, Stellenbosch, South Africa, 15-19 March, 2010, 7, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2926147 [07.10.2020].

Manatt Ch., and K., The Institution of the Ombudsman in the Former Communist Countries, International Foundation for Election Systems, 2005, 6-8, 10, 17, 19, https://ifes.org/sites/default/files/08_08_02_manatt_ulzzibayar_vangansuren.pdf [28.09.2020].

Oosting M., The Concept and Role of the Ombudsman Throughout the World, Occasional Paper, International Ombudsman Institute, #70, May, 1999, 2-3, 6.

Satyanand A., The Ombudsman Concept and Human Rights Protection, International Ombudsman Institute, #68, January, 1999, 4.

Turava P., Tskepladze N., Textbook of General Administrative Law, Tbilisi, 2010, 170-222. (in Georgian).

Jamieson O.C. R., Ombudsman Institutions Around the World: Analysis and Comparison of a Plurality and Practice, International Ombudsman Institute, #59, January, 1997, 2, 4-5.

Jibghashvili Z., Ombudsman - Legal-Institutional Guarantor of Human Rights Protection, Journal: Almanac #6 Human Rights Law (I), Sesiashvili Ir. (ed.), Georgian Young Lawyers Association, Tbilisi, 1998 (in Georgian).

The Role of Ombudsman Institutions in Open Government, OECD Working Paper on Public Governance No. 29, 2018, 7-9, http://www.oecd.org/gov/the-role-of-ombudsman-institutions-in-open-government.htm [07.10.2020]; https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?topic=24&year=all [17.10.2020].

Gottehrer M., Hostina M., Essential Characteristics of a Classical Ombudsman, https://www.usombudsman.org/essential-characteristics-of-a-classical-ombudsman/ [21.10.2020].

Information regarding „A” Status of the Public Defender of Georgia <http://www.ombudsman.ge/geo/mandati [21.10.2020].

Official letter of the Office of the Public Defender of Georgia, N24/10758, 29.10.2020, (in Geogrian), //drive.google.com/file/d/1wakyHmsQhYbxr7pWYWfm7PA3-C7G8nPK/view?usp=sharing [29.10.2020]

http://www.ombudsman.ge/geo/mekanizmis-shesakheb [21.10.2020].

Published

2020-12-31

How to Cite

Gvaramadze, T. (2020). The Ombudsman Institution – as an Alternative Grievance Mechanism in Relation to Matters of Public Administration. Journal of Law, (2), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.48614/jlaw.2.2020.139-161

Issue

Section

Articles