The Proceeding of Case of Administrative Offences in Connection with the Appeal

Authors

  • `Otar Chakhunashvili

Keywords:

administrative offence, Administrative Offences Code, proceeding in connection with the appeal, the appeal of the resolution adopted on the case of administrative offence, examination of administrative appeal, grounds for cancellation of the resolution.

Abstract

This article is devoted to the peculiarities of the proceeding of case of administrative offences in connection with the appeal. It is not a novelty that the current Administrative Offences Code of Georgia, which was adopted in 1984, fails to meet modern standards in the field of human rights protection, which is also reflected in a number of shortcomings in the rules of proceeding related to the appeal. The rules and conditions for appealing the acts issued by administrative bodies should be properly formulated in the national legislation. This will contribute to the realization of transparency, listening to the parties, expressing one’s own views and other fundamental human rights. For this purpose, taking into account the peculiarities of the field of administrative offences, this article discusses the requirements of the legislation in force to appeal the decisions on administrative offences. New mechanisms have been proposed to improve the existing process. The explanations of Constitutional Court of Georgia regarding the problematic issues are listed, with approaches the German legislation, which represents one of the leading countries in this field.

Author Biography

`Otar Chakhunashvili

Doctoral Student of Faculty of Law at Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Master of Law.

References

Constitution of Georgia, 24/08/1995.

Administrative Offences Code of Georgia, 15/12/1984.

General Administrative Code of Georgia, 25/06/1999.

Administrative Offences Act of Germany, 19/02/1987.

Adeishvili Z., Vardiashvili K., Izoria L., Kalandadze N., Kopaleishvili M., Skhirtladze N., Turava P., Kitoshvili D., General Administrative Law Handbook, Tbilisi 2005, 299 (in Georgia).

Turava P., Tskepladze N., General Administrative Law Handbook, Tbilisi, 2010, 132 (in Georgia).

Khoperia R., Admissibility of REFORMATIO IN PEIUS principle in German and Georgian Exam Laws, 2013/1, 66 (in Georgia).

Bohnert J., Bülte J., Ordnungswidrigkeitenrecht. 5. Auflage, München, 2016, 111, 116-118.

Kurz, Karlsruher Kommentar zum Ordnungswidrigkeiten, 2006, §6, 49.

Rebmann, Roth, Herrmann, Gesetz über Ordnungswidrigkeiten, 2014, §6, 25.

Maurer Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht, 18. Aufl., 2011, §10, 21.

Göhler, OWiG, Kommentar, 16. Aufl., 2012, §66, 57, 169.

Jaroschek M., Die reformatio in peius im Widerspruchsverfahren, JA, 1997, 668.

Kingreen T., Zur Zulässigkeit der reformatio in peius im Prüfungsrecht, DÖV, 2003, 2.

Oberlandersgericht Stuttgart, Monatsschrift Für Deutsches Recht, 1985, 985, 521.

Uniform practice of the Supreme Court of Georgia on administrative cases, Tbilisi, 2017.

The Decision of the Constitutional Court of Georgia of April 18, 2019 on the case: №1/3/1263.

The Decision of the Constitutional Court of Georgia of October 19, 2019 on the case:№2/7/779.

Published

2019-12-31

How to Cite

Chakhunashvili, `Otar. (2019). The Proceeding of Case of Administrative Offences in Connection with the Appeal. Journal of Law, (2), 156–169. Retrieved from https://jlaw.tsu.ge/index.php/JLaw/article/view/2904

Issue

Section

Articles