Basic constructions of freight forwarding agreements

Authors

  • Paata Kopaleishvili

Keywords:

forwarder, cargo owner, carrier, responsibility, transport document / shipping document, shipping organization.

Abstract

According to the International Federation of Freight Forwarders Associations (FIATA))[1] about 80% of different kinds of international carriages implements by the freight forwarders [2].

The freight forwarder being in the centre of transportation processes with different participants of organizational, technological and legal relationships is considered as architect in the field of international trade. Relationships with each of them, on different stages for the implementations of different tasks are based on particular agreements[3].

Transport forwarding implements on the basis of the agreement between costumer and forwarder, the agreement to bring into compliance with certain logistical scheme, defines the primary goal of forwarding – delivery a cargo to addressee timely, without any or damage.

Development of the modern multimodal[4] (mixed) freight forwarding as “freight door to door”, influenced on the forwarder’s position and his role in the freight forwarding processes. If at the beginning they were organizers of transport forwarding process, so for now just the performers. In result we have a legal content in which a forwarder becomes similar to the carrier[5]. In the conditions of this kind of rapprochement becomes difficult to define a responsibility of forwarder from a responsibility of carrier.

On the basis of generalization, comparison and analysis, in this work have presented an adopted in international practice, the specifies of the regulation of transport forwarding agreements, within two of forwarding agreements constructions.

Consideration of the issue in this way is unordinary for Georgian civil law. It is a way how to improve the regulations in the field of transport forwarding agreements settled in international practice.


* Magister of Law, Doctoral student of the law school of Grigol Robakidze University.

[1] FIATAInternational Federation of Freight Forwarders Associations, Created on May 13,  1926 By the sexteen of European national and regiaonal associations    for now FIATA members 5000 forwarding entities and unifies different forwarding associations of 150 countries, <https://fiata.com/about-fiata.html>, [25.01.18]. “Georgian freight forwarding association“  is member of the FIATA since October of 1, 1997.

[2] Горовая  К., Селивонов М., Ответсвенность экспедитора при маждународной перевозке  автомобильным транспортом,  2016, <http://interlegal.com.ua/ru/publikacii/otvetstvennost_jekspeditora_pri_mejdunarodnoj_perevozke_gruzov_avtomobilnym_transportom/>,

 [20.12.2017].

[3] Холопов К. В., Экспедиторские Документы ФИАТА в Международной и Внешней Торговле,  Журнал  Российский Внешнеэкономический Вестник”, 1- 2014, 50, 51.

[4] UN  Economic  Commission For   Europe Trade Facilitation Terms: An English-Russian Glossary, 2011 137. according with art.  571 multimodal transportations are transportations with two kinds of transports at the same time in one system of service, from shipping to delivery

[5]  Chebotarenko А. V.,  Lebedev  V. P., Freight Forwarder as a Carrier and Professional Intermediary, Informational & Business Journal Capital Express, 02- 2010,,  148.

References

საქართველოს სამოქალაქო კოდექსი, №786-IIს, 26/06/1997.

საქართველოს სარკინიგზო კოდექსი, №1911–რს, 28/12/2002.

მონრეალის 1999 წლის 28 მაისის კონვენცია საერთაშორისო საჰაერო გადაზიდვის ზოგიერთი წესის უნიფიკაციის შესახებ, სსმ, 134, 19/10/2010.

ბოლქვაძე ტ., ბოგველიშვილი ვ., გულბიანი ნ., თედორაძე რ., თოფურია ნ., ბუთხუზი ნ., გოგიაშვილი ფ., კოჩაძე ნ., ცაგარეიშვილი პ., სატრანსპორტო ლოჯისტიკა, თბ., 2015, 276.

გაბიჩვაძე შ., სატრანსპორტო ექსპედიციის სამოქალაქო სამართლებრივი რეგულირების ზოგიერთი საკითხი, ჟურნალი „მართლმსაჯულება და კანონი“, № 3(42), 2014, 125, 127, 130, 132.

ნინიძე თ., ჭანტურია ლ., ზოიძე ბ., შენგელია რ., ხეცურიანი ჯ. (რედ.), საქართველოს სამოქალაქო კოდექსის კომენტარები, წიგნი IV, ტომი I, თბ., 2001, 422-424.

საქართველოს უზენაესი სასამართლოს 2000 წლის 6 ოქტომბრის განჩინება საქმეზე № 3კ/572–2000.

საქართველოს უზენაესი სასამართლოს 2001 წლის 8 ივნისის განჩინება საქმეზე № 3კ/855.

საქართველოს უზენაესი სასამართლოს 2009 წლის 22 ოქტომბრის განჩინება საქმეზე № ბს-455-434(2კ-09).

UN Convention on the Contract for the International Carriage of Goods by Road CMR 19/05/1956 as amended by Protocol 1 to the CMR, 05/07/1978.

UN Convention on International Multimodal Transport of Goods, 24/05/1980.

UN Convention of the Carriage of Goods by Sea (“Hamburg Rules”), 31/03/1978.

UN Economic Commission for Europe Trade Facilitation Terms: An English-Russian Glossary, New York, Geneva, 2011, 137.

British International Freight Association (BIFA) Standard Trading Conditions, 2017, https://www.bifa. org/media/4077139/bifa-stc-2017-english-edition.pdf

FIATA Model Rules for Freight Forwarding Services, 1996, https://fiata.com/uploads/media/Mode l_Rules_07.pdf.

German Freight Forwardera’ (GFF) Standard Terms and Condition, 10/09/2016, http://www.simon-hegele.com/files/adsp_2017_englisch.pdf.

National Customs Brokers and Forwarders Association of America (NCBFAA) Standard Terms and Condition, http://www.ncbfaa.org/Scripts/4Disapi.dll/4DCGI/cms/review.html?Action=CMS_Document&DocID=8597&Time=2010473631&SessionID=48477704wgcde63sh270xzyrdj0qid84y448608x5k8u48b7b6gp6f35w7irio3r&MenuKey=pubs.

Chebotarenko А. V., Lebedev V. P., Freight Forwarder as a Carrier and Professional Intermediary, In-formational & Business Journal Capital Express, № 02, 2010, 148, 150, 153.

Hoeks M., Multimodal Transport Law, Netherlands, 2009, 42, 43, 46, 146, 157.

Tusevska B., Liability of the Freight Forwarders According to National and International Law, 2015, 1, 7, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280920059_liability_of_the_freight_forwarders_according_to_national_and_international_law.

Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R. R. Co. v. Acme Fast Freight, Inc., United States Supreme Court, 336 U.S. 465 (1949).

Prima USA vs. Panalpina, United States Court of Appeals for the Second US. Circuit – New York, U.S. App. Lexis 2143433 (2000), http://www.cargolaw.com/cases_panalpina.html#cargoletter.

http://fiata.com/home.html.

http://www.afg-navte.ge/contact.php.

Соглашение о Международном Железнодорожном Грузовом Сообщении (СМГС), 01/11/1951.

Правила UNTCAD/ICC в Отношении Документов Смешанных Перевозок, 1992, http://unctad.-org/en/PublicationsLibrary/tradewp4inf.117_corr.1_ru.pdf.

Горовая К., Селивонов М., Ответсвенность Экспедитора при Маждународной Перевозке Авто-мобильным Транспортом, 2016, http://interlegal.com.ua/ru/publi acii/otvetstvennost_jekspeditora_pri_mejdunarodnoj_perevozke_gruzov_avtomobilnym_transportom/.

Кокин А. С., Левиков Г. А., Транспортно-экспедиторские Услуги при Международной Перевозке Грузов, Москва, 2011, 137.

Метелёва Ю. А., Товарный Оборот, Право, Практика, Тенденции Регулирования, Москва, 2007, 139, 145, 146, 147.

Метелёва Ю., Правовое Регулирование Транспортной Экспедиции, Журнал “Россиское Право”, № 6, 2007, 65, 68, 69, 77.

Морозова Н., Типовые Экспедиторские Правила и ГК, https://www.lawmix.ru/comm/7052.

Шмиттгофф К., Экспорт: Право и Практика Международной Торговли, Москва, 1993, 157, 305.

Холопов К. В., Экспедиторские Документы ФИАТА в Международной и Внешней Торговле, Журнал “Российский Внешнеэкономический Вестник”, № 1, 2014, 50-57.

Published

2019-09-04

How to Cite

Kopaleishvili, P. (2019). Basic constructions of freight forwarding agreements. Journal of Law, (2). Retrieved from https://jlaw.tsu.ge/index.php/JLaw/article/view/2588

Issue

Section

Articles