ადმინისტრაციული ორგანოს დაპირება -კანონიერი ნდობის საფუძველი
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60131/jlaw.2.2022.7029საკვანძო სიტყვები:
ადმინისტრაციული ორგანოს დაპირება, კანონიერი ნდობა.ანოტაცია
ადმინისტრაციული ორგანოს საჯარო უფლებამოსილების განხორციელება შესაძლებელია იწვევდეს პირის უფლების შეზღუდვას/გაუარესებას. განსაკუთრებით მტკივნეულია ეს საკითხი მაშინ, როცა დაინტერესებული პირის მიმართ არსებობს ადმინისტრაციული ორგანოს მიერ წინასწარ გაცხადებული ნება, სასურველი სამართლებრივი შედეგის დადგომის შესახებ. ადმინისტრაციული კანონმდებლობა იცავს დაინტერესებული პირის კანონიერ მოლოდინს. სტატიაში განხილულია კანონიერი ნდობა, რომლის საფუძველიც შეიძლება გახდეს ადმინისტრაციული ორგანოს დაპირება.
წყაროები
Constitution of Georgia, Departments of the Parliament of Georgia, 31-33, 24/08/1995.
Administrative Procedure Code of Georgia, SSM, 39(46), 06/08/1999.
Administrative Procedure Act, Estonia, (HMS), https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/123022011008
General Administrative Code of Georgia, SSM, 32(39), 15/07/1999.
Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz (VwVfG), https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/vwvfg/ [10.09.22].
Verwaltungsgerichtsordnung, (VwGO), https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/vwgo/ [10.09.22].
Сборник законодательных актов по административным процедурам, GIZ, BMZ, 2013, 255.
Adeishvili Z., Vardiashvili K., Izoria L., Kalandadze N., Kopaleishvili M., Skhirtladze N., Turava P., Kitoshvili D., Handbook of General Administrative Law, Tbilisi, 2005, 124 (in Georgian).
Arnold R., The Role of the Rule of Law in the development of constitutional law, Journal of Constitutional Law Review, #8, 2015, 21 (in Georgian).
Burduli I., Gotsiridze E., Zoidze B. and others, Commentary on the Constitution of Georgia, Chapter Two, Tbilisi, 2013, 24 (in Georgian).
Elliot M., Unlawful representations, Legitimate Expectations and Estoppel in Public Law, Judicial Review, 2003, 73-74.
Harlow C., Rawlings R., Law and Administration, 2nd edn. (London, 1997), chs.1–2; M. Loughlin, Public Law and Political Theory, Oxford, 1992, 23.
Hawke N., Parpworth N., Introduction to Administrative Law, 1996, 130-132, 165.
Izoria L., Modern state, modern administration, Tbilisi, 2009, 116-119 (in Georgian).
Khubua G., Kalichava K. (eds.), Handbook of Administrative Science, Tbilisi, 2018, 185-186 (in Georgian).
Kozeluh U., Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft, erhältnis – Auswirkungen – Einbindung , Ein Bericht im Auftrag des Rates für Forschung und Technologieentwicklung, Wien, 2008, 25.
Kumm M., The Idea of Socratic Contestation and theRight to Justification: The Point ofRights-Based Proportionality Review, "Law & Ethics of Human Right", NYU Law School, 2010, 142, 149.
Lembcke O.W., van Klink B., Gesellschaftliche Voraussetzungen freiheitlicher Ordnung, Zeitschrift für Politische Theorie, Jahrgang 8, Heft 2/2017, 219.
Nolte G., General Principles of German and European Administrative Law - A Comparison in Historical Perspective, The Modern Law Review, 1994,191, 193, 714.
Pezzer H.-J. (Hrsg.), Vertrauensschutz im Steuerrecht, 2004,181-183, 257-258.
Pautsch A., Hoffmann L. (Hrsg)., Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz, Kommentar, 2., neu bearbeitete Auflage, 2021, 65.
Pilving L., Haldusakti siduvus. Uurimus kehtiva haldusakti õiguslikust tähendusest rõhuasetusega avalikõiguslikel lubadel, 2006, 22.
Rawlings R., Harlow C., Law and Administration, Cambridge University Press, 2009, 6, 13, 17.
Schaal G.S., Vertrauen, Verfassung und Demokratie, Wiesbaden 2004, 189.
Schwabe I., Decisions of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany, 2011, 320 (in Georgian).
Stott D., Felix A, Principles of administrative law, London, 1997, 69-71, 275-276.
Turava P., Principle of legal reliance (comparative legal analysis), Review of Georgian Law, 2007, #2-3, 212, 214, 216, 218 (in Georgian).
Turava P., Tskepladze N., Handbook of General Administrative Law, Tbilisi, 2013, 176 (in Georgian).
Uriadmkofeli K., The principle of legal reliance in administrative law, doctoral dissertation, Georgian-American University, 2015, 44, 124, https://www.gau.edu.ge/storage/app/media/GAU%20Research%20Books%20and%20Documents/Kakhaber%20Uriadmkopeli%20PhD%20Thesis-2016.pdf [10.09.22].
Vachadze M., Todria I., Turava P., Tskepladze N., Commentary on the Administrative Procedure Code of Georgia, Tbilisi 2005, 200-201 (in Georgian).
Wilmars J.M., The Case-Law of the Court of Justice in Relation to the Review of the Legality of Economic Policy in Mixed-Economy Systems, 1983, 15-16.
Wong G., Towards the Nutcracker Principle: Reconsidering the Objections toProportionality, Public Law, 2000, 95-103.
Zoidze B., The principle of preserving the essence of the basic right, Review of Constitutional Law, #6, 2012, 140 (in Georgian).
Zoidze B., Constitutional control and order of values in Georgia, Tbilisi, 2007, 46 (in Georgian).
decision of the Constitutional Court of Georgia on the case of Georgian citizens - Davit Kandelaki, Natalia Dvali, Zurab Davitashvili, Emzar Goguadze, Giorgi Meladze and Mamuka Pachuashvili against the Parliament of Georgia, #1/2/569, 11.04.2014.
Decision of the Constitutional Court of Georgia of December 27, 2013 on the case "Joint liability company Grisha Ashoredia" vs. Parliament of Georgia", No. 2/3/522,553 II-42.
Uniform practice of the Supreme Court of Georgia on administrative cases, (II half of 2014 - 2015), Supreme Court of Georgia, Tbilisi, 2017, 19 https://www.supremecourt.ge/files/upload-file/pdf/ertgvarovani-praktika-administraciuli.pdf [10.09.22].
Recommendations developed as a result of regular meetings of judges in the Supreme Court of Georgia in the field of civil and administrative law and uniform practice of the Supreme Court of Georgia on civil law issues, Tbilisi, 2011, 72, https://www.supremecourt.ge/files/upload-file/pdf/rekomenda-samoqadmin.pdf [10.09.22].
Decision of the Chamber of Administrative Cases of the Supreme Court of Georgia of May 17, 2022, case No. BS-531(K-20).
Decision of the Chamber of Administrative Cases of the Supreme Court of Georgia of November 25, 2021, case #BS-131(K-19).
Decision of the Chamber of Administrative Cases of the Supreme Court of Georgia of May 21, 2020, case NBS-268(K-19).
Decision of the Chamber of Administrative Cases of the Supreme Court of Georgia of April 2, 2020, case No. BS-570(K-19).
Decision of the Chamber of Administrative Cases of the Supreme Court of Georgia of March 7, 2019, case NBS-797 (K-18).
Decision of the Chamber of Administrative Cases of the Supreme Court of Georgia of February 3, 2015, case NBS-428-423(2k-14).
Decision of the Chamber of Administrative Cases of the Supreme Court of Georgia of February 13, 2013, case NBS-448-443(k-12)
Decision of the Chamber of Administrative Cases of the Supreme Court of Georgia of June 6, 2013, case NBS-699-685(K-12).
Decision of the Chamber of Administrative Cases of the Supreme Court of Georgia of March 17, 2010, case NBS-939-899(K-09).
Decision of the Chamber of Administrative Cases of the Supreme Court of Georgia of September 10, 2008, case NBS-942-903(K-07).
Decision of the Chamber of Administrative Cases of the Supreme Court of Georgia of January 24, 2008, case NBS-117-110(K-07).
Megadat.com SRL v. Moldova, №21151/04, §74, 08.04.2008.
Case 289/81 Mavrides v. European Parliament [1983], E.C.R. 1731, paragraph 21.
ჩამოტვირთვები
გამოქვეყნებული
როგორ უნდა ციტირება
გამოცემა
სექცია
ლიცენზია
ეს ნამუშევარი ლიცენზირებულია Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 საერთაშორისო ლიცენზიით .
