The Issue about the Provision for Damage Inflicted by Preventive Security Measures upon Adjudicating the Dispute over Legality of Enabling Individual Administrative-legal Acts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60131/jlaw.2.2022.7030Keywords:
provisional measures, preventive security, damage, conflict of private interests, legal trust.Abstract
The Constitutional Court of Georgia considers the constitutional submission of Tbilisi Court of Appeals requesting to establish the constitutionality of inadmissibility of the reversal of provision upon applying the preventive security measures in the administrative process.
The idea of admitting the reversal of provisional measures in the administrative proceedings of civil procedure standards aims at the maintenance of balance between the private interests of participants in the administrative process. However, it is impossible to speak about the methods and prospects of its implementation without the joint understanding of the enabling individual administrative-legal act as the essence of examining the result of conflict of interests, the legitimacy of state administration, the principle of legal trust and the major function of administrative justice at the stage of preventive security.
The goal of this paper is to present certain viewpoints on the problematic aspects of admissibility of the reversal of civil security in administrative proceedings and their solutions pursuant to the principle of their legal trust.
References
Constitution of Georgia, 31-33, 24/08/1995.
The General Administrative Code of Georgia, 32(39), 15/07/1999.
The Administrative Procedures Code of Georgia, 39(46), 06/08/1999.
The Civil Procedure Code of Georgia, 47-48, 31/12/1997.
The Code of Administrative Law of the Republic of France, https://www. legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/id/LEGITEXT000006070933/ [11.01.2022].
Law of Federal Republic of Germany on the “Administrative Judicial Order”, 19/03/1991, http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_vwgo/ [11.01.2022].
Arrêt du 30 novembre 2017, Red Bull / EUIPO - Optimum Mark (Combinaison des couleurs bleue et argent) (T-101/15 et T-102/15).
Spatial Planning, Architectural and Construction Code of Georgia, 3213-რს, 20/07/2018.
Abuseridze G., The preventive security measures in administrative law, Justice and law Journal, #2(62)’19, 2019, 5-19 (in Georgian).
Izoria L., Modern state- modern administration, Publishing house “Siesta” Tbilisi, 2009, 139, https://www.tsu.ge/data/file_db/faculty-law-public/L[1].Izoria-Tanamedrove%20saxel mwifo.pdf [11.01.2022] (in Georgian).
Kopaleishvili M., Skhirtladze N., Kardava E., Turava P. (ed.), Administrative Procedural Law Guide, Tbilisi, 2008, 232, 390 (in Georgian).
Turava P., General Administrative Law, publishing house “World of Lawyers”, Tbilisi, 2016, 44 (in Georgian).
Turava P., Pirtskhalashvili A., Kardava E., Administrative Proceedings in Public Service, Tbilisi, 2020, 40 (in Georgian).
Kalichava K., The subject of administrative science, in the collection: Administrative science guide, Khubua G., Kalichava K. (eds.), The Institute of Administrative Sciences, TSU, 2018, 69 http://lawlibrary.info/ge/books/2018giz-ge-administraciuli_ mecnierebis_saxelmdzgvanelo.pdf [01.11.2022] (in Georgian).
Khubua G., Definition Contra Legem, Prince David Institute for Law, Journal “Methods of Law, #2, 2018, 1-20 https://www.sabauni.edu.ge/library/samarTlis-meTodebi.-%e2%84%962.-1600250691.pdf [11.01.2022] (in Georgian).
Churghulia D., for Construction Permit Administrative Proceedings as a Mechanism for Implementing Construction Safety, “Journal of Law, #2, 2020, 180-https://doi.org/10.48614/jlaw.2.2020.180-201 [18.01.2022], (in Georgian).
Resolution of 09 July, 2020 on the case № bs – 10 (k-20), Chamber of administrative cases of Supreme Court of Georgia (in Georgian).
Judgment of 09 January, 2019 on the case №bs-1562 (us-18) of Chamber of administrative Cases of Supreme Court of Georgia (in Georgian).
Judgment of 13 June, 2017 on the case №bs-312 (k-18), Chamber of administrative Cases of Supreme Court of Georgia (in Georgian).
Judgment of 27 September, 2005 on the case Iza LTD and Makrakhidze v Georgia, European Court of Human Rights (in Georgian).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
