Definition of Legal Norms by Administrative Court
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60131/jlaw.2.2023.7706Keywords:
Court, Administrative Board, Definition of Norm, Role of Judge.Abstract
The court system is independent and it is exercised by the Constitutional Court of Georgia and the General Courts of Georgia.[1] As it is well known, the function of the court is to decide the disputed issue in favor of the side towards which the scales of law and justice lean, and not only to control the relevant systems, but also to promote their formation and development[2]. Court independence is a prerequisite for the fundamental guarantee of the rule of law and due process. A judge must inspire public confidence in the independence, fairness and impartiality of the law.[3]
The purpose of this article is to determine the peculiarity of the interpretation of the administrative norm by the court. A parallel will be made with the approaches established in the European experience and literature.
[1] Constitution of Georgia, Art. 59.
[2] Bator M., What is wrong with Supreme Court, University of Pittsburgh Law Review, Vol. 51, Issue 3, 1990, 697.
[3] Ethics of Judge <http://hcoj.gov.ge/ka/> [06.08.2023].
References
Constitution of Georgia.
General Administrative Code of Georgia.
Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct and Commentaries, German Society for International Cooperation.
Bator M., What is wrong with Supreme Court, University of Pittsburgh Law Review, Vol. 51, Issue 3, 1990, 697.
Bingham L., The Discretion of the Judge, Denning Law Journal, 1990, 27.
Bridges C., Enforcing Integrity, Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 87, 2012, 1083.
Carter F., Mechanical Details of opinion writing, Nebraska Law Review, Vol. 20, Issue 1, 76.
Chachava S., Competition of Claims and Claim Basis in Private Law Dissertation Thesis, 2010, 42 (in Georgian).
Cipelius R., Doctrine of Legal Methods, 10th Edition, Munich, 2006, 113.
Dewitt A., Classification and Restatement of the Law, Illinois Law Review, 622, 1919-1920.
Dreher C., The Judge’s Role, Judges Journal, Vol. 35, Issue 3, 1996, 16.
Gvamichava T., Admissibility of the Cassation Complaint in the Administrative Process, (comparative analysis), Dissertation, Tbilisi, 2017, 52 (in Georgian).
Kalichava K., Head of Administrative Science, Tbilisi, 2018, 362 (in Georgian).
Kalichava K., Justice and Law, 2021, 20 (in Georgian).
Khubua G., Methods of Law, Tbilisi, 2018, 1 (in Georgian).
Kipshidze Sh., The Judicial Law as a Source of Legislation, Journal of Law, №1, 2018, 209-210 (in Georgian).
Kokhreidze L., Problems of Interpretation of Some Civil-legal Norms in the Consideration of Disputes Rrelated to Inheritance, Justice and Law, 2014, 11 (in Georgian).
Laub R., The Judge’s Role in a Changing Society, Judicature, Vol. 53, 1969, 140.
Mosulishvili A., Concept of Law, Eessence, Necessity of Content Fulfillment - A Prerequisite for Strengthening the Aauthority of Llaw, Academic Bulletin, Grigol Robakidze University, No. 4, 2015, 62 (in Georgian).
Narvaez M. M., Expressing Norms Theory of Norms, Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of Law, Vol. 25, 43-100, 2015.
Palmer J., A Definition of Law, American Bar Association Journal, Vol. 22, Issue 1, 69-70.
Schwarzer W., Managing Civil Litigation: The Trial Judge’s Role, Judicature, Vol. 61, Issue 9, 1978, 402.
Strawn U., The Judge’s Role as an Educator, University of Bridgeport Law Review, 1987, 371.
Tskhadadze K., Relevance of Constitutional-legal Principles for Administrative Law, Administrative Law, 2016, 11 (in Georgian).
Tumanishvili G., Introduction in Civil law of Georgia, Tbilisi, 2012, 23 (in Georgian).
Turava P., Administrative Proceedings in Public Service, Tbilisi, 2020, 156 (in Georgian).
Turava P., Handbook of General Administrative Law, 2005, 120 (in Georgian).
Walt B., Bonczek G., Scepankova E., Matthes F., Semantic Types of Legal Norms in German Laws: Classification and Analysis Using Local Linear Explanations, Law Journal Library, 43, 2019.
Young Lawyers Association of Georgia, The right to a fair court, Tbilisi, 2001, 194 http://old.supremecourt.ge/files/upload-file/pdf/mosamartleta.qcevis-wes1.pdf last verified [10.08.2023].
Ethics of Judge http://hcoj.gov.ge/ka/ [Checked on 06.08.2023].
Consultative Council of European Judges., Decision No. 10, 2010, 9.
Supreme Court of Georgia, Decision №BS-309-309 (2K-18).
Supreme Court of Georgia, Decision №BS-942-938 (K-17).
Supreme Court of Georgia, Decision №1246-821(K-05)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
