Restoring Justice as Purpose of Punishment and Its Interrelation with the Resocialization of Criminal

Authors

  • Giorgi Arsoshvili

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60131/jlaw.1.2021.3337

Keywords:

Justice, restoration of justice, resocialization, punishment, the purpose of punishment, criminal law policy, the proportionality of punishment, individualization of punishment, imposing punishment.

Abstract

The current article is dedicated to the purpose of punishment – the restoration of justice and its interrelation with the resocialization of criminal.

Studying restoration of justice as a purpose of punishment is important in terms of Criminal Law policy, as well as it is topical from a practical and scientific point of view.

The topicality of the study is caused by the fact that it discusses the purpose of restoring justice in relation to the resocialization of criminal.

The article also studies certain circumstances that must be taken into account during the imposition of punishment, which serves the restoration of justice and at the same time facilitate subsequent resocialization of criminal.  

In this article, the essence of justice and the purpose of restoring justice are discussed taking into consideration proportionality of punishment and the principle of individualization of punishment.

The current study represents an analysis of judicial practice in view of the restoration of justice and resocialization of criminal, which in most cases is related to distinctive comprehension and specific difficulties. This study suggests certain recommendations for overcoming these difficulties.

Author Biography

Giorgi Arsoshvili

Doctoral student of Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Faculty of Law.

References

Constitution of Georgia, Departments of the Parliament of Georgia, 31-33, 24/08/1995.

Criminal Code of Georgia, LHG, 41(48), 22/06/1999.

Criminal Code of the Soviet Socialist Republic, Georgia USSR High Council records, № 1, Art. 10, 30/12/1960 (repealed, 01/06/2000).

Criminal Procedure Code of Georgi, LGH, 31, 09/10/2009.

Imprisonment Code, record of the Parliament of Georgia, LHG, 12, 24/03/2010.

Juvenile Code of Georgia, 3708-IIS, 12/06/2015.

Aristotle, Politics, Part I, Kukava T. (trans.), Tbilisi, 1995, 78 (in Georgian).

Arsoshvili G., Resocialization of the Criminal, Tbilisi, 2009, 6 (in Georgian).

Arsoshvili G., Mikanadze G., Shalikashvili M., Probation Law, Tbilisi, 2015, 199-120 (in Georgian).

Beccaria C. On crimes and Punishments, Khutsurauli I. (Ttrans.), Lezhava E. (Editor), Tbilisi, 2003, 33, 35 (in Georgian).

Chanturia L., The Application of the European Convention on Human Rights and Judicial Dialogue, Law Journal, № 2, 2019, 9-10 (in Georgian).

Christie N., Limits to Pain, Bakhtadze U. (trans.), Shalikashvili M., Giorgadze G. (eds.), The Role of Punishment in the Penal Policy, Tbilisi, 2017, 20 (in Georgian).

Dvalidze I., General Part of the Criminal Law, Other Criminal Law Outcomes of the Punishment and Crime, Tbilisi, 2013, 21, 28 (in Georgian).

Gamkrelidze O., Criminal Law Problems, Vol. III, Tbilisi, 2013, 52, 53 (in Georgian).

Gotua Z., Criminal Law, General Part, Punishment, Course of Lectures, Tbilisi, 2001, 9 (in Georgian).

Ivanidze M., Essence of the Criminal Law Policy, Journal “Justice”, № 2, 2008, 55 (in Georgian).

Khubua G., The Theory of Law, Tbilisi, 2015, 87 (in Georgian).

Lekveishvili M., Individualization of Punishment as an Important Principle of Imposing Sentence, Tendencies of Liberalization of Criminal Legislation in Georgia, Tbilisi, 2016, 187, 198, 220 (in Georgian).

Lekveishvili M., Notion and Aims of Punishment, Group of Authors, General Part of the Criminal Law, 4th edition, Tbilisi, 532 (in Georgian).

Lekveishvili M., Purpose of Punishment and Criminal Law and Criminological Aspects of Imposition of a Sanction, “Justice and Law”, № 4(43), 2014, 18 (in Georgian).

Nachkebia G., Criminal Law, General Part, 4th Edition, Tbilisi, 2015, 52 (in Georgian).

Nikoleishvili K., Compliance of the Activity of the Local Council, Discussing Issue of Putting on Parole, with the Standards of Fair Justice (Analysis of Some Issues), Law Journal, № 2, 2014, 296-300, 303-304 (in Georgian).

Shalikashvili M., Criminology, 3rd Ed., Tbilisi, 2017, 69 (in Georgian).

Shalikashvili M., Miklanadze G., Khasia M., Penal Law, Tbilisi, 2014, 81 (in Georgian).

Tkesheliadze G., Concept and Purposes of Punishment, Group of Authors, General Part of Criminal Law, Tbilisi, 2007, 354 (in Georgian).

Tsipelius R., Doctrine of Legal Methods, Totladze L. (trans.), Turava M. (ed.), 10th Edition, Tbilisi, 2016, 11 (in Georgian).

Tskitishvili T., Purpose of Punishment, as the Orientation for Sentence, Tendencies of Liberalization of Criminal Law Legislation in Georgia, Tbilisi, 2016, 523, 562 (in Georgian).

United Nations, General Comment of the UNICEF № 10 on Children's Rights in Juvenile Justice, Geneva, 2007.

Vardzelashvili I., Purposes of Punishment, Tbilisi, 2016, 6, 55, 109 (in Georgian).

Wacks R., Philosophy of Law (A very short introduction), Babukhadia M. (translator), Kurdovanidze K. (editor), 2012, 5 (in Georgian).

Decision of February 20, 2018 № 2K-527AP-17, Criminal Law Chamber of the Supreme Court of Georgia

Decision of July 6, 2018 № 2K-50AP-18, The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decision of June 25, 2018 № 1/549-17, Tbilisi City Court.

Decision of March 10, 2017 № 1b/99-17, Criminal Law Chamber of the Tbilisi Court of Appeals, available only in the archive of the court (personal data is altered).

Murray v. The Netherlands [26.04.2016], ECHR, no.10511/10, §104.

Banks C., Criminal Justice Ethics: Theory and Practice Banks C., Criminal Justice Ethics: Theory and Practice, Thousand Oaks, California, 2004, 116.

Conton R., Probation and the Philosophy of Punishment, Probation Journal, Vol. 65 (3), 2018, 266.

Dressler J., Understanding Criminal Law, 7th Ed., San Francisco, CA, 2015, 49.

Duyunov V. K., Mechanism of Criminal Law Impact Theoretical Grounds and Practice of Realization, Moscow, 2001, 162 (in Russian).

Krilova N., Sereprenikova A., Criminal Law of Foreign Countries (England, USA, France, Germany), Moscow, 1977, 144 (in Russian).

Lippman M., Contemporary Criminal Law, Concepts, Cases and controversies, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, California, 2010, 56

Materni M., Criminal Punishment and the Pursuit of Justice, British Journal of American Legal Studies, Vol. 2, Issue 1, 2013, 283.

Meijer S., Rehabilitation as a Positive Obligation, European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Justice, Vol. 25, Issue 2, 2017, 152.

Nikiforov B. S., Reshetnikov F. M., Modern American Criminal Law, Moscow, 1990, 47 (in Russian).

Papatheodorou T., De Individualisation, des Peines et la Personnalisation de Sanctions, Revue Internationale de Criminologie edde Police technique, № 1, 1993, 109.

Roscoe P., An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law: Revised ed., Chelsea, Michigan, 1982, 7.

BVerfGE, 35. Band, 1973, Rn. 85, BVerfG, Urteil vom 05.06.1973 - 1 BvR 536/72 - openJur, [04.02.2021].

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

Arsoshvili, G. (2021). Restoring Justice as Purpose of Punishment and Its Interrelation with the Resocialization of Criminal . Journal of Law, (1), 35–53 (Geo.) 24. https://doi.org/10.60131/jlaw.1.2021.3337

Issue

Section

Articles