Regulation of Restorative Justice in the European Union and its Importance for Strengthening the Standing of Victims of Crime in Georgia

Authors

  • Khatia Tandilashvili

Keywords:

Restorative Justice, Victim of Crime, Criminal Proceeding, Diversion and Mediation.

Abstract

In the modern world the restorative justice gains its popularity day by day and it becomes a very important mechanism to meet the interests of the victims of crime. According to the victims of crime,  they feel recognized, gain back the sense of security and it becomes easier to recover from the impact of crime by means of restorative justice. Because of  these positive effects, the restorative justice gained attention on the international level. As a result standards regarding to the restorative justice were laid down in a number of international instruments.

 It should be mentioned,  that Juvenile Justice Code in Georgia is familiar with the diversion and mediation program, which represents the restorative justice. Regarding to the adult justice system, the Criminal Procedure Code of Georgia is familiar with the diversion institution and one of the conditions of the diversion, particularly, full or partial compensation, at the first glance, may be considered as the restorative justice. But the analyse of international standards and practice give us the reason to conclude that the compensation alone could not be considered as a form of restorative justice. Therefore in Georgia the victims of crime (if the case is not handled by the juvenile justice) do not enjoy access to the restorative justice, which put them in the weak legal standing. Therefore this article aims to clearly demonstrate the standards of the restorative justice, to highlight the characteristics of the diversion, which is laid down in the Criminal Procedure Code of Georgia, to emphasize that the victims of crime do not have access to the restorative justice and in this way to promote its establishment in the adult justice. 

References

Criminal procedure Code of Georgia, LHG, 31, 09/10/2009.

Juvenile Justice Code, 12/06/2015.

Order No.120 of February 1, 2016 of the Minister of Justice of Georgia “on the approval of the procedure for imposing the diversion/diversion and mediation program on the minors and the terms and conditions of an agreement to be concluded between the parties”.

Council Framework Decision of 15 March 2001 on the Standing of Victims in Criminal Proceedings (2001/220/JHA), 15/03/2001.

Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power, A/RES/40/34, 29/11/1985.

Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25th October 2012 Establishing Minimum Standards on the Rights, Support and Protection of Victims of Crime, and Replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA, 25/10/2012.

ECOSOC Resolution 2002/12, Basic Principles on the Use of Restorative Justice Programmes in Criminal Matters, 2002.

Recommendation No. R (99) 19 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States Concerning Mediation in Penal Matters, 15/11/1999.

Strafprozessordnung (StPO) von Österreich, 9/12/1975, https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.-wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10002326.

APAV, IVOR Report, Implementing Victim-Oriented Reform of the Criminal Justice System in the European Union, Portugal, 2016, 55-56, https://www.apav.pt/ivor/images/ivor/PDFs/IVOR-Repot-WebVersion.pdf.

Bachinger L. M., Pelikan C., Victim and Mediation in Austria, Victims and Restorative Justice, Van-fraechem I., Bolívar D., Aersten I. (eds.), Oxfordshire, NY, 2015, 91.

Béal C., Justice Restaurative et Justice Pénale, JournalRue Descartes, 2018/1, (№ 93), 60, https://-www.cairn.info/revue-rue-descartes-2018-1-page 58.htm?try_download=1&contenu=article.

Beloof D., Victims’ Rights, A Documentary and Reference Guide, USA, 2012, 20-24.

Blackstock J., Protecting Victims: EU Competences and Mechanisms for Safeguards, Symposium “Le-gal Perspectives on the Victim”, 2012, 8, http://2bquk8cdew6192tsu41lay8t.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Protecting-Victims-EU-Competences-and-mechanisms-for-safeguards.pdf.

Borgers M., Implementing Framework Decisions, Journal Common Market Law Review, Vol. 44, 1361–1386, 2007, 1361, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4c26/394a09f32b1dcba956bec8622c7a131-df9cd.pdf.

Brunilda P., European Forum for Restorative Justice, Briefing Paper about the Regulation of Restorative Justice in the Directive 2012/29/EU, 2016, 3, 9-10, 12-16, http://www.euforumrj.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/EFRJ-Briefing-Paper-RJ-in-the-Victims-Directive.pdf .

Buczma S., Kierzynka R., Protection of Victims of Crime in the View of the Directive 2012/29/EU Establishing Minimum Standards on the Rights, Support and Protection of Victims of Crime in the European Union and the Directive 2011/99/EU on the European Protection Order, Judicial Academy of the Slovak Republic, 1-2, http://www.ja-sr.sk/files/Kierzynka_Bu¬czma_Protection%20of%20vic-tims.pdf.

Cario R., Justice Restaurative: Principes et Promesses, Journal Les Cahiers Dynamiques, 2014/1 (№ 59), 24, https://www.cairn.info/revue-les-cahiers-dynamiques-2014-1-page-24.htm.

Commentary on the Criminal Procedure Code of Georgia, Tbilisi, 2015, 487-488 (in Georgian).

Chkeidze I., Diversion-Mediation Program for Juveniles, Kutaisi, 2018, 4. (in Georgian).

Daimagüler M. G., Der Verletzte im Strafverfahren, Handbuch für die Praxis, München, 2016, 301.

Dearing A., Justice for Victims of Crime, Human Dignity as the Foundation of Criminal Justice in Europe, Switzerland, 2017, 341.

Deymié B., Justice Restaurative: Le Dialogue Avant la Peine, Journal Revue Projet, 2018/5 (N° 366), 79-80, https://www.cairn.info/revue-projet-2018-5-page-79.htm.

European Commission, DG Justice, Guidance Document Related to the Transposition and Implementation of Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25th October 2012 Establishing Minimum Standards on the Rights, Support and Protection of Victims of Crime, and Replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA, Ref. Ares(2013)3763804 , 2013, 32-33.

European Forum for Restorative Justice, Practice Guide for Restorative Justice Services, The Victims’ Directive Challenges and Opprtunities for Restorative Justice, Belgium, 2016, 4, 6, 8, 16-17, http://www.euforumrj.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Practice-guide-with-cover-page-for-website.pdf.

European Forum for Restorative Justice, Victims and Restorative Justice, Country Report, Bolívar D., Aersten I., Vanfraechem I. (eds.), 2015, 142, http://www.euforumrj.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/-05/report_victimsandRJ-2.pdf .

Gade C. B. N., “Restorative Justice”: History of the Term’s International and Danish Use, Nordic Mediation Research, Nyland A., Ervasti K., Adrian L. (eds.), 2018, 32-37, https://link.sprin-ger.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-319-73019-6.pdf.

Gavrielides T., The Victims’ Directive and What Victims Want From Restorative Justice, Victims & Offenders: An International Journal of Evidence-based Research, Policy, and Practice, London, 2015, 2, 8-11, 13, 19, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276107075_The_Victims'_Directive_and_-What_Victims_Want_From_Restorative_Justice.

Herman S., Parallel Justice for Victims of Crime, Washington, DC, 2010, VIII- IX, 40.

Kasper J., Schlickum G., Weiler E., Der Täter-Opfer-Ausgleich, München, 2014, 1- 4, 20, 34, 43-44, 54-55, 81-82.

Kilchling M., Opferrechte und Restorative Justice, Opferrechte in Europäischer, Rechtsvergleichender und Österreichischer Perspektive, Sautner L., Jesionek U. (Hrsg.), Viktimologie und Opferrechte, Schriftreihe der Weisser Ring Forschungsgesellschaft, Band 8, Innsbruck, 2017, 54-55, 64, 65, 67, 71, 72, 76, 78.

Lauwaert K., European criminal justice policies on victims and restorative Justice, Victims and Restorative Justice, Vanfraechem I., Bolívar D., Aersten I. (eds.), Oxfordshire, NY, 2015, 245, 248, 255-257, 260, 267.

Meyer-Großner L., Schmidt B., Strafprozessordung mit GVG und Nebengesetzen, Beckliche Kurzkommenare, München, 2018, 815, 853-854.

Moyersoen J., Chronique d'une Justice Restaurative au-delà des Frontières, Journal Les Cahiers Dyna-miques, 2014/1 (№59), 96, https://www.cairn.info/revue-les-cahiers-dynamiques-2014-1-page-96.htm.

Satzger H., Schluckebier W., Widmaier G., Strafprozessordnung mit GVG und EMRK Kommentar, Heymanns Kommenatare, Köln, 991, 1012-1013.

Tandilashvili K., Opferrechte im Strafverfahren nach der europäischen und georgischen Gesetzgebung, Deutsch-Georgische Strafrechtszeitschrift, No.2, 2017, 55-56, http://www.dgstz.de/-storage/documents/m0wMkIuJTKf3nihzQgPFnyshtBiqcw6PcrPFy4TH.pdf.

Vanfraechem I., Bolívar D., Restorative Justice and Victims of Crime, Victims and Restorative Justice Vanfraechem I., Bolívar D., Aersten I. (eds.), Oxfordshire, NY, 2015, 49-51. 53-54.

Zehr H., The Little Book of Restorative Justice, NY, 2015, 13-20, 30, 57.

Zehr H., Stutzman Amstutz L., MacRae A., Pranis K., The Big Book of Restorative Justice, NY, 2015, 136

Regarding to the Mediation Program, http://prevention.gov.ge/page/31/geo.

Regarding to the restorative justice in Germany, https://e-justice.europa.eu/content_rights_of_vic-tims_of_crime_in_criminal_proceedings-171-DE-maximizeMS-en.do?clang=en&idSubpage=1&member=1.

Regarding to the restorative justice in Austria, https://e-justice.europa.eu/content_rights_of_-victims_of_crime_in_criminal_proceedings-171-AT-maximizeMS-en.do?clang=en&idSubpage=5&member=1.

Regarding to the restorative justice in France, https://e-justice.europa.eu/content_rights_of_vic-tims_of_crime_in_criminal_proceedings-171-FR-maximizeMS-en.do?clang=en&idSubpage=5&member=1.

Regarding to the restorative justice in Finland, https://e-justice.europa.eu/content_rights_of_vic-tims_of_crime_in_criminal_proceedings-171-FI-maximizeMS-en.do?clang=en&idSubpage=1&member=1№n10.

Regarding to the restorative justice in Sweden, https://e-justice.europa.eu/content_rights_of_vic-tims_of_crime_in_criminal_proceedings-171-SE-maximizeMS-en.do?clang=en&idSubpage=5&member=1.

Regarding to the restorative justice in Belgium, https://e-justice.europa.eu/content_rights_of_vic-tims_of_crime_in_criminal_proceedings-171-BE-maximizeMS-en.do?clang=en&idSubpage=1&member=1.

Published

2019-06-30

How to Cite

Tandilashvili, K. (2019). Regulation of Restorative Justice in the European Union and its Importance for Strengthening the Standing of Victims of Crime in Georgia. Journal of Law, (1). Retrieved from https://jlaw.tsu.ge/index.php/JLaw/article/view/2637

Issue

Section

Articles