Implication of the Principle of Nominalism upon Fulfillment of a Monetary Obligation

Authors

  • Zurab Dzlierishvili Grigol Robakidze University

Keywords:

Monetary obligations; the principle of 'nominalism'; Article 389 of the Civil Code of Georgia (CCG).

Abstract

Monetary is the obligation[1], the object of which is the payment of a certain amount of money.[2] According to common understanding, money, as an economic category and an article of commerce, accomplishes certain duties in public relationships. The concept of money is a part of not only the economic life, but also of the legal world.[3] The duties of the money are identical functions both in private and public law relations, encompassing the universal option of evaluation, transfer, and accumulation of values, being a settlement unit as well.

Based on the analysis of the doctrine and judicial practice the paper discusses not the specificities of fulfillment of a monetary obligation in general, but rather the legal nature of the so-called principle of 'nominalism' envisaged by Article 389 of the CCG. This rule aims at promoting the development of market economy and procurement for the sustainability of civil-law relations.[4]

 

[1] Donnelly M., The Law of Banks and Credit Institutions, Dublin, 2000, 369.

[2] Weiler F., Schuldrecht AT, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2012, § 9, Rn 2.

[3] Mann F. A., The Legal Aspect of Money with Special Reference to Comparative Private and Public International Law, 5th ed., Oxford, 1992, 3.

[4] Meskhishvili K., Topical Issues of Private Law, Vol. I, GIZ, Tbilisi, 2020, 128 (in Georgian).

Author Biography

Zurab Dzlierishvili , Grigol Robakidze University

Judge of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Georgia; Doctor in Law, Professor at the Faculty of Law at Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University.

References

Civil Code of Georgia, Parliamentary Gazette, 31, 26/06/1997.

Asatiani R., Money and Monetary Systems, Tbilisi, 1996, 31, 32 (in Georgian).

Atamer Y. M., in: Kröll St., Mistelis L., Viscasillas P. P., UN-Convention on the International Sales of Goods (CISG).

Beale H. G., Principles of European Contract Law, Lando O. (ed.), Parts I-II, Kluwer Law International, The Hague, London, Boston, 2000, 374.

Chachava S., Competition of Claim and Grounds for Claim in Private Law, Doctoral Thesis, TSU, Tbilisi, 2010, 72 (in Georgian).

Chantladze M., Definition of the Declaration of Will, Reduction of Forfeit, Principle of Nominalism, Journal “Georgia law Review”, № 1, 2002, 172-174 (in Georgian).

Chanturia L., Credit Security Law, Tbilisi, 2012, 7 (in Georgian).

Chanturia L., General Part of Civil Law, Tbilisi, 2011, 357 (in Georgian).

Chitashvili N., Adjustment of a Contract to Changed Circumstances as a Legal Consequence of Complication of Fulfillment of an Obligation, Law Journal, № 1, 2014, 204.

Donnelly M., The Law of banks and credit institutions, Dublin, 2000, 369.

Dzlierishvili Z., Tsertsvadze G., Robakidze I., Svanadze G., Tsertsvadze L., Janashia L., Contract Law, Tbilisi, 2014, 248 (in Georgian).

Dzlierishvili Z., Legal Nature of Contracts on Transfer of Property under Ownership, Tbilisi, 2010, 296 (in Georgian).

Dzlierishvili Z., Specificities of Fulfillment of Monetary Obligation, Tbilisi, 2005, 39 (in Georgian).

Eichengreen B., International Monetary Arrangements for the 21st Century, Intergrating National Ecohomies,Washington, 1994, 29.

Feibelman A., Europe and the Future of International Monetary Law, Symposium Issue: The European Sovereign Debt Crisis: A Critical Assessment of the Euro & European Monetary Union, Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems, 22, http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic/ [30.03.2020].

Fox D., The Case of Mixt Monies: Confirming Nominalism in the Common Law of Monetary Obligations, Cambridge Law Journal 70(1), March, 2011, 144-174.

Grothe H., in: Bamberger H. G., Roth H., Hau W., Poseck R., BeckOK BGB, 53. Aufl., München, §244, Rn.1-3

Grundmann St., in: MüKo, BeckOK BGB, 8. Aufl., München, 2019, §244, Rn.2.

Gruber G., Geldwertschwankungen und handelsrechtliche Verträge in Deutschland und Frankraich. Bestandsaufnahme und Aussichten für das europäische Währungs und Privatrecht, Berlin, 2002, 41.

Grüneberg Ch., in: Palandt O., BGB Komm., 78 Aufl., München, 2018., § 245, Rn. 2., §293, Rn. 1.

Hofmeister H., Goodbye Euro: Legal Aspects of Withdrawal from the Eurozone, European Legal Studies Center, Columbia University Columbia Journal of European Law, Fall, 2011, http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic/ [30.03.2020].

Issing O., Stabiles Geld –eine Illusion? Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2019, 5.

Jansen N., Zimmermann R., Was ist und wozu der DCFR? NJW, 2009, 3401.

Kakulia R., Khelaia G., General Theory of Money Circulation and Credit, Tbilisi, 2003, 18 (in Georgian).

Keynes J. M., Allgemeine Theorie der Beschäftigung, des Zinses und des Geldes, Aus dem Englischen neu übersetz von Nicola Liebert, Buch V, Kapitel 19, Berlin, 2017, 145.

Lorenz St., Bamberger H. G., Roth H., Hau W., Poseck R., BeckOK BGB, 53. Aufl., München, 2020, §313, Rn. 2-3.

Lonzhanidze P., Currency Rate in Monetary Obligations, Journal “Human Being and Constitution”, № 3, 2000, 70 (in Georgian).

Lenihan N., The Legal Implications of the European Monetary Union under U.S and New York Law, 72. http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/publication11220_en.pdf [30.03.2020].

Mann F. A., The Legal Aspect of Money With special reference to Comparative Private and Public International Law, 5th Ed., Oxford, 1992, 3.

Meskhishvili K., Topical Issues of Private Law, Vol. I, GIZ, Tbilisi, 2020, 128 (in Georgian).

Meskhishvili K., Online Commentary of the Civil Code of Georgia, Article 389, field 3, www.gccc.ge [30.03.2020] (in Georgian).

Meskhishvili K., Impact of the Change of Currency Rate on Civil Relations, “Georgian Business Law Review”, V Issue, 2016, 7 (in Georgian).

Meskhishvili K., Payment of Interest in the Case of Overdue Payment of Money (Theory and Judicial Practice, “Georgian Business Law Review”, V Issue, 2016, 19 (in Georgian).

Omlor S., Geldprivatrecht Entmaterialisierung, Europäisierung, Entwertung, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2014, 51.

Schulte-Nölke H., Clive E., von Bar Cr. (eds.), Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law: Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR), Outline Edition, Münich, 2009.

Smidt-Kessel M., in: Prüting H., Wegen G., Weinreich G., BGB Komm., 14. Aufl., Köln 2019, §244, 369.

Shotadze T., Mortgage as a Security Mean for a Bank Credit, Tbilisi, 2012, 138-142 (in Georgian).

Tskepladze N., Payment of Monetary Obligations in the Case of Change of Currency Unit, “Georgian Law Review”, № 1, 2003, 194 (in Georgian).

Vashakidze G., Civil Code System of Complicated Obligations, Tbilisi, 2010, 98 (in Georgian).

Weiler F., Schuldrecht AT, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2012, § 9, Rn 2, 8.

Wittreck F., Geld als Instrument der Gerechtigkeit, BRILL, Ferdinand Schöning, 2002, 165 ff., htpp//www. Schöeningh.de/view/title/45057 [30.03.2020].

Zoidze B., Reception of European Private Law in Georgia, Tbilisi, 2005, 268 (in Georgian).

Zoidze B., Chanturua L., Zoidze B., Ninidze T., Khetsuriani J., Shengelia R., (Ed.) Commentary on Georgian Civil Code, Book Three, Tb., 2001, Article 383, 267 (in Georgian).

Ruling of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Georgia in the Case № AS-1190-2018, dated 12 April, 2019.

Ruling of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Georgia in the Case № AS-1298-2018, dated 22 March, 2019.

Ruling of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Georgia in the Case № AS-831-831-2018, dated 22, March 2019.

Ruling of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Georgia in the Case № AS-1162-2018, dated 08 February, 2019.

Ruling of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Georgia in the Case № AS-54-54-2018, dated 13 February, 2018.

Ruling of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Georgia in the Case № AS-1269-1189-2017, dated 15 December, 2017.

Ruling of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Georgia in the Case № AS-130-122-2017, dated 24 March, 2017.

Ruling of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Georgia in the Case № AS-762-730-2016, dated 16 January, 2017.

Ruling of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Georgia in the Case № AS-217-207-2016, dated 20 May, 2016.

Ruling of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Georgia in the Case № AS-147-143-2016, dated 20 May, 2016.

Ruling of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Georgia in the Case № AS-501-475-2015, dated 31 March 2016.

Ruling of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Georgia in the Case № AS-1512-1427-2012, dated 01 December, 2014.

Ruling of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Georgia in the Case № AS-1153-1173-2011, dated 31 October 2011.

Ruling of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Georgia in the Case № AS-1096-1125-2011, dated 06 October, 2011.

Ruling of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Georgia in the Case № AS-347-323-2010, dated 19 July, 2010.

Ruling of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Georgia in the Case № AS-239-564-2009, dated 17 September, 2009.

Ruling of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Georgia in the Case № AS-870-1138-2005, dated 09 March, 2006.

www.duncker-humblot.de [30.03.2020].

www.mohr.de [30.03.2020].

Published

2020-06-30

How to Cite

Dzlierishvili , Z. (2020). Implication of the Principle of Nominalism upon Fulfillment of a Monetary Obligation . Journal of Law, (1), 14–28. Retrieved from https://jlaw.tsu.ge/index.php/JLaw/article/view/2948

Issue

Section

Articles