Regulation of the Risk of Negative Occurrences at the Stage of Contract Performance –Reference to Economic Analysis of Law


  • Ana Pipia


Performance of a Contract, Economic Analysis, Behavioural Standard, Risk Allocation, Substantial Performance, Impossibility of Performance, Interpretation of a Contract.


This paper focuses on the determination of regulation of potential risks at the stage of contract performance during the development of law-of-obligations relations. It examines the allocation of risks related to the performance of obligation. The paper discusses approaches of Anglo-American (common law) and German legal systems; however, the leading role is accorded to economic analysis of law-of-obligations relations, which mainly concerns the determination of practical importance of legal regulation. Within the scope of this area of research, the paper offers an analysis of respective articles of the Civil Code of Georgia in conjunction with comparable or similar solutions of common law or German law systems.


Civil Code of Georgia, Parliament of Georgia, Parliamentary Gazette, № 31, 24/07/1997.

Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act, 11/11/1999,

German Civil Code BGB, Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection in cooperation with juris GmbH, 18/08/1896,

Sale of Goods Act, 06/12/1979,

The Frustrated Contracts Act, 05/08/1943,¬ment/id/complete/¬statreg/-96166_01.

Uniform Commercial Code, 1952,

Uniform Sales Act, 01/01/1906,

Anson W. R., Corbin A., Arthur L., Principles of the Law of Contract with a Chapter on the Law of Agency, NY, 1924, 3, 8, 530.

Arnsperger C., Varoufakis Y., What is Neoclassical Economics? The Three Axioms Responsible for its Theoretical Oeuvre, Practical Irrelevance and, thus, Discursive Power, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Vol. 53(1), 2005, 6.

Beatson J., Anson’s Law of Contract, 28th ed., US, 2002, 3, 510, 514, 507, 530, 541, 534, 558, 60, 182.

Chanturia L., Zoidze B., Commentary on the Civil Code of Georgia, Third Book, Tbilisi, 2001, 517, 302, 371, 517 (in Georgian).

Coase R. H., The Nature of the Firm, Economica, New Series, Vol. 4, № 16, 1937, 394.

Coleman J. L., Heckathorn D. D., Maser S. M., A Bargaining Theory Approach to Default Provisions and Disclosure Rules in Contract Law, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 12, № 3, 1989, 640.

Corbin A., The Parol Evidence Rule, The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 53(4), 1944, 610.

Dzlierishvili Z., Tsertsvadze G., Robakidze I., Svanadze G., Tsertsvadze L., Janashia L., Contract Law, Tbi-lisi, 2014, 351 (in Georgian).

Evidence, Outlines, 2016, 29-30,

Francis B. T., Handbook of the Law of Sales, US, 1895, 196.

Gordon D., An Introduction to Economic Reasoning, Alabama, 2000, 183.

Rommen H. A., Natural Law: A Study in Legal and Social History and Philosophy, Hanley Th. R. (trans.), US, 1998, 71.

Kereselidze D., Most General Systemic Notions of Private Law, Tbilisi, 2009, 83 (in Georgian).

Kropholler J., German Civil Code, Study Comments, Darjania T., Tchetchelashvili Z. (trans.), Chachanidze E., Darjania T., Totladze L. (eds.), Tbilisi, 2014, 264, 150, 341, 343, 142 (in Georgian).

Kornhauser L., The Economic Analysis of Law, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2001, 2,

Lowisch M., New Law of Obligations in Germany, Ritsumeikan Law Review, № 20, 2003, 17.

Macneil I. R., Efficient Breach of Contract: Circles in the Sky, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 68, № 5, 1982, 947.

Macneil I. R., Economic Analysis of Contractual Relations: Its Shortfalls and the Need for a Rich Classifi-catory Apparatus, Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 75, № 6, 1980-1981, 1020, 1025, 1032.

Martin S., Randall L. A. E., Law of Contracts, NY, 1912, 602, 612.

McGovern W. M., Contract in Medieval England: The Necessity for Quid pro Quo and a Sum Certain, The American Journal Legal History, Vol. XIII, 1969, 5.

Pieck M., A Study of the Significant Aspects of German Contract Law, Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law, Vol. 3, 1996, 118.

Posner R. A., Economic Analysis of Law, 7th ed., US, 2007, xxi, 93, 105.

Posner E. A., Economic Analysis of Contract Law After Three Decades: Success or Failure?, U Chicago Law And Economics, Olin Working Paper, № 146, 2002, 9, 14.

Posner R. A., The Law and Economics of Contract Interpretation, The Chicago Working Paper Series, Vol. 83:1581, 2004, 5, 1.

Posner R. A., Rosenfield A. M., Impossibility and Related Doctrines in Contract Law: An Economic Analy-sis, The Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 6, № 1, 1977, 84, 90, 108.

Shavell S., On the Writing and the Interpretation of Contracts, The Journal of Law, Economics and Organi-zation, Vol. 22, 2006, 290, 310.

Smeenk B. P., Ambiguities and Extrinsic Evidence, Advocates' Quarterly, Vol. 12, 1990, 237.

Thompson S. D., Respondeat Superior, 1879, 238,

Willimason O. E., Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations, The Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 22, № 2, 1979, 236, 237.

Williston S., Law Governing Sales of Goods at Common Law and Under the Uniform Sales Act, NY, 1909, 190.

Zorzetto S., Reasonableness, The Italian Law Journal, Vol. 01, № 01, 2015, 107, 117, 119.



How to Cite

Pipia, A. (2018). Regulation of the Risk of Negative Occurrences at the Stage of Contract Performance –Reference to Economic Analysis of Law. Journal of Law, (2). Retrieved from