კორპორაციული მართვის თეორიები: სამართლებრივი ანალიზი
საკვანძო სიტყვები:
საკორპორაციო, მმართველობა, სამართალი, თეორიები.ანოტაცია
სახელმწიფოს მმართველთა ფუნქციაა საზოგადოების გაძღოლა უკეთესი მომავლისაკენ, რისი მიღწევაც შესაძლებელია მხოლოდ კარგი მმართველობის მეთოდებისა და პრინციპების გამოყენებით. ერთ-ერთი ძირითადი ინსტრუმენტი, რომლითაც ხდება პრაქტიკაში კარგი მმართველობის განხორციელება, არის სახელმწიფო ორგანოთა მიერ საკანონმდებლო აქტების მიღება, თუმცა იმისათვის, რომ კანონმა შეძლოს საზოგადოების მომავალზე დადებითი გავლენის მოხდენა, აუცილებელია, იგი ეყრდნობოდეს მყარ თეორიულ საწყისებს.
პრობლემაა ის ფაქტი, რომ ხშირად მიიღება ნორმები, რომლებიც ეყრდნობა ავტორის მიერ ნაკლებად შესწავლილ და გააზრებულ თეორიებს. აუცილებელია, მოხდეს ფუნდამენტური იდეების უკეთ გააზრება, რათა სახეზე იყოს კარგი მმართველობა. ერთ- ერთი დარგი, რომელშიც სახეზეა გარკვეული დეფიციტი სამართლის საფუძვლების გააზრების თვალსაზრისით, საქართველოში არის კორპორაციული მართვა.
კორპორაციული მართვის სფეროში გვხვდება საკმაოდ ექსტენსიური მოწესრიგება როგორც საკანონმდებლო, ისე კანონქვემდებარე დონეზე ნორმატიული აქტების გამოყენებით. ამის მიუხედავად, თითქმის არ არსებობს აკადემიური ლიტერატურა, რომელშიც დეტალურად იქნებოდა შესწავლილი კორპორაციული მართვის სხვადასხვა, დღეისათვის მიღებული თეორიები. სწორედ ამ დეფიციტის აღმოფხვრა და ამ დარგში კარგი მმართველობის პრინციპების დაფუძნებისათვის ხელის შეწყობა არის წინამდებარე ნაშრომის ძირითადი მიზანი.
წყაროები
The Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part, 2014, Annex XXVIII.
Georgian Civil Code, 1997.
Georgian Law on Entrepreneurs, 1994.
Georgian Law on the Securities Market,1998.
Abdullah H., Valentine B., Fundamental and Ethics Theories of Corporate Governance, Middle Eastern Finance and Economics, 4, 2009, 88-96.
Aduda J., Chogii R., Maguta P.O., An Empirical Test of Competing Corporate Governance Theories on the Performance of Firms Listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange, European Scientific Journal, 9.13., 2013, 107-137.
Afza T., Ehsan S., Nazir S., Whether Companies Need to be Concerned about Corporate Social Responsibility for their Financial Performance or Not? A Perspective of Agency and Stakeholder Theories, European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 4.4., 2015, 664-682.
Aggarwal S., Goel R., Vashishtra P.K., A Literature Review of Agency Theory, Indian Journal of Research, 3.5., 2014, 51-52.
Aggarwal P., Impact of Corporate Governance on Corporate Financial Performance, IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 13.3., 2013, 1-5.
Agyemang O.S., Aboagye E., Frimpong J., Where Does the Relevance of Corporate Governance Lie? Business and Economics Journal, 5.3., 2014, 1-4.
Alam A., Shah S., Corporate Governance and its Impact on Firm Risk, International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, 2.2., 2013, 76-98.
Albrecht W.S., Albrecht C.C., Albrecht C.O., Fraud and Corporate Executives: Agency, Stewardship and Broken Trust, Journal of Forensic Accounting, 5, 2004, 109-130.
Allen W.T., Contracts and Communities in Contract Law, Washington Lee Law Review, 50, 1993, 1395-1407.
Allen F., Bernardo A.E., Welch I., A Theory of Dividends Based on Tax Clienteles, The Journal of Finance, 55.6., 2000, 2499-2536.
Al-Mamun A., Yasser Q.R., Rahman A., A Discussion of the Suitability of Only One vs More than One Theory for Depicting Corporate Governance, Modern Economy, 4, 2013, 37-48.
Al-Matari M., Al-Swidi A.K., Fadzil F.H.B., The Effect of the Internal Audit and Firm Performance: A Proposed Research Framework, International Review of Management and Marketing, 4.1., 2014, 34-41.
Annas J., Virtue Ethics and Social Psychology, A Priori, 2, 2003, 20-34.
Alves E.R., Gomes E.R., Corsini L.F., The Characteristics of Power, Legitimacy and Urgency of Stakeholders and the actions of Corporate Social Responsibility of Companies, Asian Journal of Business and Management Sciences, 3.7., 2014, 34-46.
Andersen J.P., Prause J., SIlver R.C., A Step-by-Step Guide to Using Secondary Data for Psychological Research, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5.1., 2010, 56-75.
Aziz N.A.A., Manab N.A., Othman S.N., Exploring the Perspectives of Corporate Governance and Theories on Sustainability Risk Management (SRM), Asian Economic and Financial Review, 5.10., 2015, 1148-1158.
Babatunde M.A., Olaniran O., The Effects of Internal and External Mechanism on Governance and Performance of Corporate Firms in Nigeria, Corporate Ownership & Control, 7.2., 2009, 330-344.
Badiyani B.M., Corporate Governance: Ethical Issues and Popular Theories International Journal of Research in Economics & Social Sciences, 3.2., 2013, 15-19.
Baiman S., Agency Research in Managerial Accounting: A Second Look, Accounting, Organization and Society, 15.4., 1990, 341-371.
Ballard M.J., Post-Conflict Property Restitution: Flawed Legal and Theoretical Foundations, Berkeley Journal of International Law, 28.2., 2010, 462-496.
Basle M., Delorme R., Lemoigne J.L., Paulre B., Approches Évolutionnistes De La Firme Et De L’industrie, Paris, Harmattan, 1999. (in French)
Bather A., Tucker R., Legitimacy Theory and a Compliance Analysis of Tesco’s 2008 Business Review, International Review of Business Research Papers, 7.2., 2011, 137-156.
Biesenthal C., Wilden R., Multi-level Project Governance: Trends and Opportunities, International Journal of Project Management, 32.8., 2014, 1291-1308.
Bitler M.P., Moskowitz T.J., Vissing-Jorgensen A., Testing Agency Theory with Entrepreneur Effort and Wealth The Journal of Finance, 60.2., 2006, 539-576.
Bonazzi L., Islam S.M.N., Agency Theory and Corporate Governance: A Study of the Effectiveness of Board in Their Monitoring of the CEO, Journal of Modelling in Management, 2.1., 2007, 7-23.
Boshkoshka M., The Agency Problem: Measures for Its Overcoming, International Journal of Business and Management, 10.1., 2015, 204-209.
Branco M.C., Rodrigues L.L., Positioning Stakeholder Theory within the Debate on Corporate Social Responsibility, Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 12.1., 2007, 5-15.
Brown J.A., Forster W.R., CSR and Stakeholder Theory: A Tale of Adam Smith, Journal of Business Ethics, 112.2., 2011, 301-312.
Brust S., Ancient and Modern: Natural Law and Universal Moral Principles, The Catholic Social Science Review, 14, 2009, 65-74.
Caers R., Du Bois C., Jegers M., De Gieter S., Schepers C., Pepermans R., Principal-Agent Relationships on the Stewardship-Agency Axis, Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 17.1., 2006, 25-47.
Carroll A.B., Shabana K.M., The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice, International Journal of Management Reviews, 12.4., 2010, 85-105.
Cornforth C., La Gouvernance des Coopérativeset des Sociétés Mutuelles: Une Perspective de Paradoxe, Économie et Solidarités, 35.6., 2005, 81-99. (in French)
Chiba M., Other Phases of Legal Pluralism in the Contemporary World. Ratio Juris: An International Journal of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law, 11.3., 1998, 228-245.
Choy L.T., The Strengths and Weaknesses of Research Methodology: Comparison and Complimentary between Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science, 19.4., 2014, 99-104.
Church R.M., The Effective Use of Secondary Data, Journal of Learning and Motivation, 33, 2001, 32-45.
Clarkson M.B.E., A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance, Academic Management Review, 20, 1995, 92-117.
Coase R.H., The Nature of the Firm, Economica, 4.16., 1937, 386-405.
Connely B., Hoskisson R., Tihanyi L., Certo S., Ownership as a Form of Corporate Governance, Journal of Management Studies, 47.8., 2010, 1561-1589.
Costa M.D., Impact of CEO Duality and Board Independence on FTSE Small Cap & Fledgling Company Performance, World Review of Business Research, 5.1., 2015, 1-19.
Crane A., Matten D., Business Ethics, 2nd ed., London, Oxford University Press, 2007.
Daly H., Conflicts of Interest in Agency Theory: A Theoretical Overview, Global Journal of Human-Social Science: Economics, 15.1., 2015, 17-22.
Davis G.F., Thompson T.A., A Social Movement Perspective on Corporate Control, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39.1., 1994, 141-173.
Davis J.H., Schoorman F.D., Donaldson L., Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management. Academy of Management Review, 22.1., 1997, 20-47.
De Vries M.S., The Challenge of Good Governance, The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 18.1., 2013, 2-9.
Donaldson L., Davis J., Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns, Australian Journal of Management, 16.1., 1991, 49-65.
Donaldson T., Preston L.E., The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications, The Academy of Management Review, 20.1., 1995, 65-91.
Drost E.A., Validity and Reliability in Social Science Research, Education Research and Perspectives, 38.1., 2011, 105-122.
Du Plessis J., McConvill J., Bagaric M., Principles of Contemporary Corporate Governance, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Eisenhardt K., Agency Theory: an Sssessment and a Review, Academy of Management Review, 14.1., 1989, 57-74.
Emirbayer M., Mische A., What Is Agency? The American Journal of Sociology, 103.4., 1998, 962-1023.
Fadun O.S., Corporate Governance and Insurance Company Growth: Challenges and Opportunities, International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 2.1., 2013, 286-305.
Fama E.F., Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm, Journal of Political Economy, 88, 1980, 288-307.
Fama E.F., Jensen M.C., Separation of Ownership and Control, Journal of Law and Economics, 26.2., 1989, 301-325.
Felicio J.A., Rodrigues R., Study on The Influence of Governance Mechanisms on Performance: Evidence of Nonlinear Relationships of Listed Companies in Different Contexts, Corporate Ownership & Control, 11.2., 2014 429-532.
Ferrero I., Hoffman W.M., McNulty R.E., Must Milton Friedman Embrace Stakeholder Theory? Business and Society Review, 119.1., 2004, 37-59.
Fox M.A., Hamilton R.T., Ownership and Diversification: Agency Theory or Stewardship Theory, Journal of Management Studies, 31.1., 1994, 69-81.
Freeman R.E., Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Boston, Pitman Publishing, 1984.
Freeman R.E., Wicks A.C., Parmar B., Stakeholder Theory and The Corporate Objective Revisited, Organization Science, 15.3., 2004, 364-369.
Geyskens I., Steenkamp J.E.M., Kumar N., Make, Buy, or Ally: A Transaction Cost Theory Meta-Analysis, Academy of Management Journal, 49.3., 2006, 519-543.
Göbel E., Der Stakeholderansatz im Dienste der Strategischen Früherkennung, Zeitschrift für Planung, 1, 1995, 55-67 (in German).
Goel A.M., Thakor A.J., Overconfidence, CEO Selection and Corporate Governance, The Journal of Finance, 63.6., 2008, 2737-2784.
Goshkheteliani N., Galdava D., Authorized Capital in Georgian Legislation – A Comparative Legal Analysis and an Alternative Regulation, Young Barristers Scientific Journal, 4, 2015, 33-42.Georgian Law on Entrepreneurs, 1994 (in Georgian).
Gourevitch P.A., The Politics of Corporate Governance Regulation, The Yale Law Journal, 112, 2003, 1829-1880.
Hadani M., Horanova M., Khan R., Institutional Investors, Shareholder Activism, and Earnings Management, Journal of Business Research, 64, 2011, 1352-1360.
Hardt L., The History of Transaction Cost Economics and Its Recent Developments, Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 2.1., 2009, 29-51.
Hendley K., “Telephone Law” and the “Rule of Law”: The Russian Case, Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 1, 2009, 241-262.
Hiebl M.R.W., Peculiarities Of Financial Management In Family Firms, International Business & Economics Research Journal, 11.3., 2012, 315-322.
Hitt M., Freeman E., Harrison J., Handbook of Strategic Management, Oxford, Blackwell Publishing, 2001.
Hoepfl M.C., Choosing Qualitative Research: A Primer for Technology Education Researchers, Journal of Technology Education, 9.1., 1997, 47-63.
Htay S.N.N., Salman S.A., Transaction Cost Theory, Political Theory and Resource Dependency Theory in The Light of Unconventional Aspect, IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 12.5., 2013, 89-96.
Hubbard R., Criteria of good governance, Optimum, The Journal of Public Management, 30.2., 1999, 37-50.
Hung H., A Typology of the Theories of the Roles of Governing Boards, Scholarly Research and Theory Papers, 6.2., 1998, 101-111.
Jensen M.C., Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function, Business Ethics Quarterly, 12.2., 2002, 235-256.
Jensen M.C., Meckling W.H., Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 1976, 305-360.
Johnson-Laird P.N., Deductive Reasoning, Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 1999, 109-135.
Jupp J., Legal Transplants as Tools for Post-Conflict Criminal Law Reform: Justification and Evaluation, Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law, 3.1., 2014, 381-406.
Kaeb C., Putting the “Corporate” Back into Corporate Personhood, Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 35.3., 2015, 591-653.
Kakabadze N.K., Rozuel C., Lee-Davies L., Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Approach: A Conceptual Review, International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 1.4., 2005, 277-302.
Keser C., Willinger M., Theories of Behavior in Principal–Agent Relationships with Hidden Action, European Economic Review, 51., 2007, 1514-1533.
Kessler F., Theoretic Bases of Law, The University of Chicago Law Review, 9, 1941, 98-112.
Kral P., Tripes S., Pirozek P., Pudil P., Corporate Governance Against Recommendations: The Cases of the Strong Executive and the Strong Ownership, Journal of Competitiveness, 4.3., 2012, 46-57.
Lane J., Good Governance: The Two Meanings of “Rule of Law”, International Journal of Politics and Good Governance 1.1., 2010, 1-27.
Lau J.W.C., Enriching Stakeholder Theory: Student Identity of Higher Education, American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 4, 2014, 762-766.
Lentner C., Szegedi K., Tatay T., Corporate Social Responsibility in the Banking Sector, Public Finance Quarterly, 57, 2015, 95-103.
Letting N., Wasike E., Kinuu D., Murgor P., Ongeti W., Aosa E., Corporate Governance Theories and Their Application to Boards of Directors: A Critical Literature Review, Prime Journal of Business Administration and Management, 2.12., 2012, 782-787.
Long-Sutehall T., Sque M., Addington-Hall J., Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Data: a Valuable Method for Exploring Sensitive Issues with an Elusive Population? Journal of Research in Nursing, 16.4., 2010, 335-344.
Mamun A., Vasser Q., Rahman A., A Discussion of the Suitability of Only One vs More than One Theory for Depicting Corporate Governance, Modern Economy, 4, 2013, 37-48
Marshall S., Ramsay I., Stakeholders and Directors’ Duties: Law, Theory and Evidence, UNSW Law Journal, 35.1., 2012, 291-316.
Masry M., The Impact of Ownership Duality on Firm Performance in Egypt, International Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 3.1., 2015, 54-73.
Milgrom P., Employment Contracts, Influence Activity and Efficient Organization, Journal of Political Economy, 96, 1988, 42-60.
Mitchell R.K., Agle B.R., Wood D.J., Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts, The Academy of Management Review, 22.4., 1997, 853-886.
Moir L., What Do We Mean by Corporate Social Responsibility? The Journal of Corporate Governance, 1.2., 2001, 16-22.
Moscu R.G., Does CEO Duality Really Affect Corporate Performance? International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 2.1., 2013, 156-166.
Mouritz T., Comparing the Social Contracts of Hobbes and Locke, The Western Australian Jurist, 1, 2010, 123-127.
Mullenbach-Servayre A., L’apport de la Théorie des Partiesprenantes à la Modélisationde la Responsabilité Sociétale des Entreprises, Revue des Sciences de Gestion, 223, 2007, 109-120 (in French).
Muth M.M., Donaldson L., Stewardship Theory and Board Structure: A Contingency Approach, Scholarly Research and Theory Papers, 6.1., 1998, 5-28.
Namazi M., Role of the Agency Theory in Implementing Management’s Control, Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 5.2., 2003, 38-47.
Nasieku T., Olubunmi E.M., Togun O.R., Corporate Governance And firm’s Earnings Quality, Economics and Finance Review, 3.12., 2014, 1-10.
Nichols P.M., The Viability of Transplanted Law: Kazakhstani Reception of a Transplanted Foreign Investment Code University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law, 18.4., 1997, 1235-1279.
Nordberg D., The Ethics of Corporate Governance, Journal of General Management, 33.4., 2008, 35-52.
Numa G., Théorie de l’agence et concessions de chemins de fer français au 19 ème siècle, Revue d’économie industrielle, 125, 2009, 105-128 (in French).
Obeten O.I., Ocheni S., Empirical Study of the Impact of Corporate Governance on The Performance of Financial Institutions in Nigeria, Journal of Good Governance and Sustainable Development in Africa, 2.2., 2014, 57-73.
Omran M.A., Theoretical Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: A Critical Review, International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 5.2., 2015, 38-55.
Othman Z., Rahman R.A., Understanding Corporate Governance from a Social Constructionist Perspective, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1.2., 2011, 123-127.
Palia D., Porter R., Agency Theory in Banking: An Empirical Analysis of Moral Hazard and the Agency Costs of Equity, Banks and Bank Systems, 2.3., 2007, 142-156.
Pangendler M., Politics in the Origins: The Making of Corporate Law in Nineteenth-Century Brazil, The American Journal of Comparative Law, 60, 2012, 805-850.
Pejovic C., Civil Law and Common Law: Two Different Paths Leading to the Same Goal, Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 32, 2001, 817-842.
Pérez-González F., Inherited Control and Firm Performance, American Economic Review, 96.5., 2006, 1559-1588.
Perrow C., Complex Organizations, New York, Random House, 1986.
Pfeffer J., Merger as a Response to Organizational Interdependence, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1972, 218-228
Pfeffer J., Power in Organizations, Marshfield, Massachusetts, Pitt-Man Publishing, 1981.
Pour B.S., Nazari K., Emami M., Corporate Social Responsibility: A Literature Review, African Journal of Business Management, 8.7., 2014, 228-234.
Prendergast C., The Provision of Incentives in Firms, Journal of Economic Literature, 37.1., 1999, 7-63.
Quinn E., The Complex Relationship between Corporate Management, Stakeholders and Accounting, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 4.3., 2014, 80-88.
Rensburg R.R., De Beer E., Stakeholder Engagement: A Crucial Element in the Governance of Corporate Reputation Communitas, 16, 2011, 151-169.
Reynolds S.J., Schultz F.C., Hekman D.R., Stakeholder Theory and Managerial Decision-Making: Constraints and Implications of Balancing Stakeholder Interests, Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 2006, 285-301.
Roe M.J., Strong Managers, Weak Owners: The Political Roots of American Corporate Finance, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1994.
Rose P., Common Agency and the Public Corporation, Vanderbilt Law Review, 63.5., 2010, 1355-1417.
Sacconi L., Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance, EconomEtica, 38, 2012, 1-42.
Schaltegger S., Bildung und Durchsetzung von Interessen zwischen Stakeholder der Unternehmung, Eine politisch-ökonomische Perspektive, Die Unternehmung, 53.1., 1999, 3-20 (in German).
Schleifer A., Vishny R., A Survey of Corporate Governance, The Journal of Finance, 52.2., 1997, 737-783.
Setyorini C.T., Ishak Z., Corporate Social and Environmental Disclosure: A Positive Accounting Theory View Point, International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3.9., 2012, 152-164.
Shapiro S.P., Agency Theory, Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 2005, 263-284.
Shim E.D., Sustainability, Stakeholder Perspective and Corporate Success: A Paradigm Shift, International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 4.5., 2014, 64-67.
Smith S.S., Integrated Reporting, Corporate Governance, and the Future of the Accounting Function, International Journal of Business and Social Science, 5.10., 2014, 58-63.
Spahaj E., Empirical Data on the Correlation between CEO Duality and the Performance of a Corporation, European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2.1., 2015, 55-61.
Spence A.M., Zeckhauser R., Insurance, Information and Individual Action, American Economic Review, 61, 1971, 380-387.
Sundaram A.K., Inkpen A.C., Stakeholder Theory and The Corporate Objective Revisited: A Reply, Organization Science, 15.3., 2004, 370-371.
Tchanturia L., Akhvlediani Z., Zoidze B., Jorbenadze S., Ninidze T., Commentary on the Georgian Civil Code, Book One, Tbilisi, Publishing House Samartali, 2002, 276-279.
Thomas S.L., Heck R.H., Analysis of Large-Scale Secondary Data in Higher Education Research: Potential Perils Associated with Complex Sampling Designs, Journal of Research in Higher Education, 42.5., 2001, 517-540.
Tourani-Rad A., Ingley C., Handbook on Emerging Issues in Corporate Governance, Singapore, World Scientific Publishing Co, 2011.
Tudose M.B., Corporate Finance Theories, Challenges and Trajectories, Management & Marketing Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 7.2., 2012, 277-294.
Tullberg J., Stakeholder Theory: Some Revisionist Suggestions, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 42, 2013, 127-135.
Ugwoke R.O., Onyeanu E.O., Obodoekwe C.N., Duality Role of Chief Executive Officer (CEO) in Corporate Governance and Performance of Quoted Companies in the Nigerian Stock Exchange: An Appraisal of the Perception of Managers and Accountants, Global Journal of Management and Business Research Accounting and Auditing, 13.5., 2013, 1-10.
Van Ness R., Miessing P., Kang J., Understanding Governance and Corporate Boards: Is Theory a Problem, European Journal of Management, 7.9., 2009, 186-199.
Van Slyke D.M., Agents or Stewards: Using Theory to Understand the Government-Nonprofit Social Service Contracting Relationship, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 2006, 157-187.
Vo T.N.T., To Be or Not to Be Both CEO and Board Chair, Brooklyn Law Review, 76.1., 2010, 65-129.
Volaard H., Martinsen D.S., Bounded Rationality in Transposition Processes: The Case of the European Patients’ Rights Directive, West European Politics, 37.4., 2014, 711-731.
Wald A., Corporate Governance als Erfolgsfaktor? Industrielle Beziehungen, 16.1., 2009, 67-86 (in German).
Wang B., Theme in Translation: A Systemic Functional Linguistic Perspective, International Journal of Comparative Literature & Translation Studies, 2.4., 2014, 54-63.
Weibel A., Kooperation in StrategischenWissensnetzwerken, Vertrauen und Kontrolle zur Losung des Sozialen Dilemmas, Wiesbaden, Mohr Siebeck, 2004 (in German).
Weiss F., Steiner S., Transparency as an Element of Good Governance in the Practice of the EU and the WTO: Overview and Comparison, Fordham International Law Journal, 30.8., 2013, 1545-1586.
Wenger E., Terberger E., Die Beziehung zwischen Agent und Prinzipal als Baustein einer ökonomischen Theorie der Organisation, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium, 17.10., 1990, 506-514 (in German).
Williamson O.E., The Mechanisms of Governance, New York, Macmillan Free Press, 1998.
Wright P., Mukherji A., Kroll M.J., A Reexamination of Agency Theory Assumptions: Extensions and Extrapolations, Journal of Socio-Economics, 30, 2001, 413-429.
Wood M., Welch C., Are ‘Qualitative’ and ‘Quantitative’ Useful Terms for Describing Research? Methodological Innovations Online, 5.1., 2010, 56-71.
Yilmaz A., Management Strategies for Resource Dependency Risk in Aviation Business, International Review of Management and Business Research, 3.3., 2014, 1551-1563.
Yussoff W., Alhaji I., Insight of Corporate Governance Theories, Journal of Business & Management, 1.1., 2012, 52-63.
Zajac E.J., Olsen C.P., From Transaction Cost to Transactional Value Analysis: Implications for the Study of Interorganizational Strategies, Journal of Management Studies, 30.1., 1993, 131-145.
Zerk J.A., Multinationals and Corporate Social Responsibility: Limitations and Opportunities in International Law, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Бакунова Н.В., Мухаровский Н.В., Трансформация Корпоративного Управления в Условиях Рыночных Отношений, Вестник Омского университета, 2, 2011, 80-84.
Белобородова А.Л., Специфика Применения Теории Заинтересованных Сторон В Управлении Субъектами Малого Предпринимательства, Казанский Экономический Вестник, 5.7., 2013, 78-82.
Благов Ю.Е., Классика Теории Менеджмента, Вестник Санкт-Петербургского Университета, 1, 2012, 109-116.
Васильев Ю.В., Парахина В.Н., Ушвицкий Л.И., Теория Управления, Издание Второе, Москва, Издательство Финансы и Статистика, 2005.
Виханский О.С., Наумов А.И., Размышления о Менеджменте - “Другой” Менеджмент: Время Перемен, Российский Журнал Менеджмента, 3, 2004, 105-126.
Капогузов Е., Вклад Новой Институциональной Экономической Теории в Реформирование Общественного Сектора, Журнал институциональных исследований, 3.4., 2011, 6-17.
Леванов Л.Н., Теоретико-Методологические Подходы к Понятию “Корпоративное Управление“, Известия Саратовского Университета, 12.1., 2012, 54-60.
Либман В.А., Теоретические Аспекты Агентской Проблемы в Корпораций, Вестник, СПбГУ, 8.1., 2005, 123-140.
Стрекалова А.А., Второе Поколение Фискального Федерализма, Журнал Human Progress, 2.3., 2016, 1-12.
Чернышев М.А., Тяглое С.Г., Теория Организации, Ростов-на-Дону, Издательство Феникс, 2008.
Юрова К.И., Особенности Классификации Коллекторских Агентств и Организации Коллекторских Компаний, Научно-практический журнал Государство и право в XXI веке, 1, 2016, 27-31.
ჩამოტვირთვები
გამოქვეყნებული
როგორ უნდა ციტირება
გამოცემა
სექცია
ლიცენზია
საავტორო უფლებები (c) 2018 სამართლის ჟურნალი
ეს ნამუშევარი ლიცენზირებულია Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 საერთაშორისო ლიცენზიით .
