დიფამაცია როგორც მიუღებელი შემოსავალი
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60131/jlaw.1.2025.9280საკვანძო სიტყვები:
დიფამაცია, ცილისწამება, მიუღებელი შემოსავლი, პატივი, ღირსება, სამსახურებრივი რეპუტაცია.ანოტაცია
დიფამაცია როგორც მიუღებელი შემოსავალი, საკმაოდ პრობლემური საკითხი აღმოჩნდა, რამაც მის აქტუალურობას გაუსვა ხაზი. დიფამაციის მიმართულებით სასურველი იქნებოდა უფრო მეტი ქართულენოვანი ლიტერატურა ან თუნდაც სტატიები შექმნილიყო. უცხოურ კანონმდებლობასა და ანალიტიკურ მასალაზე დაყრდნობით, შეიძლება ითქვას, რომ დიფამაციასა და ცილისწამებას შორის სხვაობა დიდია. აქვე, ისიც აღსანიშნავია, რომ ამ სხვაობის გაქრობა, დიდი ალბათობით, გამოიწვია საქართველოში ცილისწამების დეკრიმინალიზაციამ, რამაც საბოლოოდ ცილისწამება და დიფამაცია ტერმინოლოგიურად გაუტოლა ერთმანეთს.
კარგი იქნებოდა გააზრებულიყო ცილისწამების, როგორც სისხლისსამართლებრივი დანაშაულის მნიშვნელობა, რისი საქართველოში დეკრიმინალიზაციით მართალია მეტად გარანტირებული გახდა სიტყვის და გამოხატვის თავისუფლების უფლება, თუმცა აღნიშნულზე დაყრდნობით ადამიანის პატივისა და ღირსების გამტეხი ინფორმაციის გავრცელების აკრძალვის დაწესების უგულებელყოფა მიუღებელია.
სამეცნიერო სტატიის მიზანია დღესდღეობით აქტუალური და პრობლემური საკითხის, კერძოდ კი დიფამაციის როგორც მიუღებელი შემოსავლის ერთ-ერთი წინაპირობის ბუნების შესწავლა, ასევე პრობლემების გადაჭრის ავტორისეული გზების დასახვა.
წინამდებარე კვლევის საგანს წარმოადგენს დიფამაციის, როგორც მიუღებელი შემოსავლის სამართლებრივი ბუნების, დოქტრინისა და სასამართლოს პრაქტიკის შესწავლა.
ნაშრომის შექმნის პროცესი, ძირითადად, არის დოქტრინალური ტიპის, სადაც გამოყენებულია კრიმინოლოგიური კვლევის შემდეგი მეთოდები: დოკუმენტური; შედარებით სამართლებრივი; დესკრიფციული; ისტორიულ-სამართლებრივი და სისტემური.
წყაროები
Zoidze B., Commentary on the Civil Code of Georgia, Book Three, Tbilisi, Publisher "Samartali", 2001, 463-464.
Kropholler I., German Civil Code, Educational Commentary. Tbilisi: German International Cooperation Society (GIZ), 2014, 113.
Rusiashvili G., Online Commentary on the Civil Code, 2019, art. 411.
Surguladze I., "History of Georgian Law", 2014, 112.
Sukhitashvili D., Sukhitashvili T., Civil Liability, 2016, 176-177.
Dzlierishvili Z., et al., Contractual Law, Tbilisi, Publisher "Meridiani", 2014, 653, 653.
Jorbenadze S., "Defamation in Social Media and Legal Means of Protection," Journal: "My Advocate," 2022;
Amerasinghe A., Ranjit B., Defamation in the Law of South Africa and Ceylon, H.W. Cave, Colombo, 1969, 43–44.
Arend P.S., Defamation in an Age of Political Correctness: Should a False Public Statement that a Person is Gay be Defamatory?, 18 North Illinois University Law Review, 1997, 99.
Arend, Patrice S., Defamation in an Age of Political Correctness: Should a False Public Statement that a Person is Gay be Defamatory? 18 North Illinois University Law Review, 1997, 99.
Balkin, R., Davis J., Law of Torts, 4th edn, LexisNexis, 2008. Bezanson, Randall P. and Kathryn L. Ingle, Plato’s Cave Revisited: The Epistemology of Perception in Contemporary Defamation Law, 90(3) Dickinson Law Review, 1986, 585.
Baudouin J.L., La responsabilité civile délictuelle. 3e éd. Cowansville: Y. Blais, 1990. 838, 162–164.
Brosius H., Dirk E., The Causes of Third-Person Effects: Unrealistic Optimism, Impersonal Impact, or Generalized Negative Attitudes Towards Media Influence?, 8(2) International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 1996, 142.
Calvert C., Awareness of Meaning in Libel Law: An Interdisciplinary Communication & Law Critique, 16 The Northern Illinois University Law Review, 1995, 111.
Calvert C., Harm to Reputation: an Interdisciplinary Approach to the Impact of Denial of Defamatory Allegations, 26 Pacific Law Journal, 1995, 933.
Calvert C., The First Amendment and the Third Person: Perceptual Biases of Media Harms & Cries for Government Censorship, 6 CommLaw Conspectus, 1998, 165.
Cameron M., Rivkin Settles Defamation Case, The Australian, 8 July, 2004, 18.
Christian H., Social Reputation: A Mechanism for Flexible Self-Regulation of Multiagent Systems, 10 Journal of Artificial Societies & Social Simulation, 2007.
Cohen, Jeremy et al., Experimental Test of Some Notions of the Fact/Opinion Distinction in Libel, 66 Journalism Quarterly, 1989, 11.
Combined Media Defamation Reform Group, Submission in Response to “Outline of Possible National Defamation Law”, Attorney-General’s Discussion Paper – March 2004, May 2004.
Culbertson H.M., Stempel G.H., ‘Media Malaise: Explaining Personal Optimism and Societal Pessimism about Health Care, 35(2) Journal of Communication, 1985, 180.
David P., Johnson M., The Role of Self in Third-Person Effects about Body Image, 48(4) Journal of Communication, 1998, 37.
Davison, W. Phillips, The Third-Person Effect Revisited, Summer, 8(2) International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 1996, 2.
Davison, W., The Third-Person Effect in Communication, 47 Public Opinion Quarterly, 1983, 1.
De Visser R., Heterosexual Experience and Recent Heterosexual Encounters Among a Representative Sample of Adults, 27(2) Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2003, 146.
Dent Ch., Defamation Law’s Chilling Effect: a Comparative Content Analysis of Australian and US Newspapers, 9(2) Media & Arts Law Review, 2004, 89.
Donoghue D., England, their England: Commentaries on English Language and Literature, University of California Press, 1989, 56.
Driscoll P.D., Salwen M.B., Self-Perceived Knowledge of the OJ Simpson Trial: Third-Person Perception and Perceptions of Guilt, 74 Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 1997, 541.
Eisenberg J., Abbott, Kennett and Costello, 1999, 153 Communications Update 19. Eldridge, Laurence H., Law of Defamation Bobs-Merrill Co., Indianapolis, 1978, 45.
Eveland Jr., William P., Douglas M., The Effect of Social Desirability on Perceived Media Impact: Implications for Third-Person Perceptions, 11 International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 1999, 315.
Fleming J.G., The Law of Torts, 9th edn, Thomson Reuters, 1998.
Frederick G.B., Gifts and Poison, in Gifts and Poison: The Politics of Reoutation, 1, 4, F.G. Bailey ed., 1971.
Fricke G.L., The Criterion of Defamation, 32 Australian Law Journal, 1958, 7.
Gashi H., Acquisition and Loss of Ownership Under the Law on Property and Other Real Rights (LPORR): The Influence of the BGB in Kosovo Law, 2013, 88–89.
George P., Damages Survey for Defamation, paper presented at Media Law and Defamation seminar, Centre for Continuing Legal Education course, Faculty of Law, University of New South Wales, 14 March 2003, 48, 56.
Glasser Ch.J. Jr. (ed.), International Libel & Privacy Handbook, 2nd edn, Bloomberg Press, 2009, 76.
Glynn C.J., Ostman R.E., Public Opinion about Public Opinion, 65 Journalism Quarterly, 1988, 299.
Glynn C.J., Haynes A.F., Shanahan J., Perceived Support for One’s Opinions and Willingness to Speak Out: A Meta-Analysis of Survey Studies on the “Spiral of Silence”, 61 Public Opinion Quarterly, 1997, 452, 58.
Gunther A.C., What We Think Others Think: Cause and Consequence in the Third-Person Effect, 18(3) Communication Research, 1991, 355.
Harkess J., A Linguistic Inspection of the Law of Defamation, Auckland University Law Review, 1998, 653.
Hart J.D., Why Expert Testimony on the Meaning of Language has no Place in Libel Suits, in David A. Schulz, Libel & Newsgathering Litigation – Getting & Reporting the News, Practising Law Institute, 1998, 510, 517, 519.
Heider F., The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations, Routledge, 1958, 23.
Heine S.J., Lehman D.R., Cultural Variation in Unrealistic Optimism: Does the West Feel More Invulnerable than the East?, 68 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995, 595.
Hrysanthos D., The Digitization of Word of Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms, 49 Management Science, 2003, 1407, 36.
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, Same-Sex: Same Entitlements, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, 2007, 77.
Jones E.E., Nisbett R.E., The Actor and the Observer: Divergent Perceptions of the Causes of Behavior, in E.E. Jones et al. (eds), Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1987, 79.
Judith D., Signals in Social Supernets, 13 Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2007, 12, 14.
Kenyon A.T., Defamation: Comparative Law and Practice, OUP, 2006, 121.
Kim Y., Ahn J., Song J., Perceived Media Influence on Self and Others on a Controversial Issue, paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, May 1991, unseen, cited in Dominic L. Lasorsa, Policymakers and the Third-Person Effect, in J. David Kennamer (ed.), Public Opinion, The Press and Public Policy, 1992, 163, 170.
Koster, 1980, 38. Opelt, 1965, 13.
Krasnostein S., Defamation Law and the Fairness of the Objective Test, 23(4) Communications Law Bulletin, 2004, 6.
Kundu A., Defamation, Reputation and the Community: an Analysis of the Doctrine of Presumed Harm in Defamation Law, 10(1) Media & Arts Law Review, 2005, 53.
Lasorsa D.L., Real and Perceived Effects of “Amerika”, 66 Journalism Quarterly, 1989, 373.
Lexis N., Australian Defamation Law & Practice. Barnett L.L., Defamation, Reputation, and the Myth of Community, 71(1) Washington Law Review, 1996, 1.
Liebermann, 1998, 1050. Nisbet, 1961, 192.
Lik M., Notions of Reputation in Multi-Agents Systems: A Review, in Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: Part 1, Bologna, Italy, July 15–19, 2002, 78.
Magnusson R., Freedom of Speech in Australian Defamation Law: Ridicule, Satire and Other Challenges, 9 Torts Law Journal, 2001, 269.
Mason L., Newspaper as Repeater: An Experiment on Defamation and Third-Person Effect, Autumn, 72(3) Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 1995, 610.
Mason L., Newspaper as Repeater: An Experiment on Defamation and Third-Person Effect, Autumn, 72(3) Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 1995, 610.
McCraw D., How do Readers Read? Social Science and the Law of Libel, 41 Catholic University Law Review, 1991, 81.
McLeod D.M., Detenber B.H., Eveland Jr. W.P., Behind the Third-Person Effect: Differentiating Perceptual Processes for Self and Other, 51(4) Journal of Communication, 2001, 679.
McNamara L., Bigotry, Community and the (In)visibility of Moral Exclusion: Homosexuality and the Capacity to Defame, 6(4) Media & Arts Law Review, 2001, 271.
McNamara L., Reputation and Defamation, OUP, 2007, 67, 87.
Milmo P., Rogers W.V.H. (eds), Gatley on Libel and Slander, 11th edn, Sweet and Maxwell, 2008, 45, 502.
Müller, 1913, 492–502; Miniconi, 1959, 159–175.
Mutz D.C., The Influence of Perceptions of Media Influence: Third Person Effects and the Public Expression of Opinions, 1989, 1.
Nadeau A., Nadeau R., Traité pratique de la responsabilité civile délictuelle. Montréal: Wilson & Lafleur, 1971. 732, 248.
Patrick G., Damages Survey for Defamation, paper presented at Media Law and Defamation seminar, Centre for Continuing Legal Education course, Faculty of Law, University of New South Wales, 14 March 2003.
Paul B., Salwen M., Dupagne M., The Third-Person Effect: A Meta-Analysis of the Perceptual Hypothesis, 3(1) Mass Communication & Society, 2000, 57.
Perloff R.M., Perceptions and Conceptions of Political Media Impact: The Third-Person Effect and Beyond, in Ann N. Crigler (ed.), The Psychology of Political Communication, The University of Michigan Press, 1996, 197.
Perloff R.M., Perceptions of “Amerika”, 19 Mass Communication Review, 1992, 42.
Pineau J., Ouellette M., Théorie de la responsabilité civile. 2e éd. Montréal: Éd. Thémis, 1980, 237, 62, 63, 64.
Pound R., Interests of Personality, 28(4) Harvard Law Review, 1915, 343.
Price D., Cain N., Duodu K., Defamation Law, Procedure and Practice, 4th edn, Sweet & Maxwell, 2009, 54.
Prosser W., Keeton W.P., Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts, 5th edn, West Publishing, 1984, 98.
Rissel Ch., Attitudes Towards Sex in a Representative Sample of Adults, 27(2) Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2003, 118.
Rivard A., Calvert C., Awareness of Meaning in Libel Law: An Interdisciplinary Communication & Law Critique, 16* The Northern Illinois University Law Review, 1995, 111. De la liberté de la presse, Montréal: Garneau, 1923, 125, 67.
Robin D.U., Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language, 171–74, 1996, 37.
Rolph D., Reputation, Celebrity and Defamation Law, Ashgate, 2008.
Rolph D., Vitins M., Bannister J., Media Law: Cases, Materials and Commentary, OUP, 2010, 42, 43, 5, 87.
Salwen M.B., Dupagne M., The Third-Person Effect: Perceptions of the Media’s Influence and Immoral Consequences, 26(5) Communication Research, 1999, 526, 523.
Shah D.V., Susceptibility and Severity: Perceptual Dimensions Underlying the Third-Person Effect, 26(2) Communication Research, 1999, 240.
Siegfried J., Sprachliche Gewalt gegenüber Minderheiten: Formen der sprachlichen Diffamierung in den Medien und im politischen Diskurs, in: Der Deutschunterricht, 59, 5, 2007, 11, 21.
Simon G., Herrmann B., Human Cooperation From an Economic Perspective, in P. Kappeler & C.P. van Schaik (eds.), Cooperation in Primates and Humans, 2006, 279, 31.
Sprankling J., The International Law of Property, Oxford University Press, 2014, 111.
Standley T.C., Linking Third-Person Effect and Attribution Theory, unpublished Master’s thesis, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas, cited in Paul B., Salwen M., Dupagne M., The Third-Person Effect: A Meta-Analysis of the Perceptual Hypothesis, 3(1) Mass Communication & Society, 2000, 57.
Tewkesbury D., The Role of Comparison Group Size in the Third-Person Effect, 14(3) International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 2002, 247.
Tiedge J.T., Discrepancy Between Perceived First-Person and Perceived Third-Person Mass Media Effects, 1991, 61.
Treiger-Bar-Am L.K., Defamation Law in a Changing Society: the Case of Youssoupoff v Metro-Goldwyn Mayer, 20 Legal Studies, 2000, 291.
Vallières N., La presse et la diffamation: rapport soumis au ministère des Communications du Québec, Montréal: Wilson & Lafleur, 1985, 138, 6–8, 10, 49, 52, 58, 90.
Ven-hwei Lo W., Third-Person Effect, Gender, and Pornography on the Internet, 46(1) Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 2002, 13.
Von Vechten V., The History and Theory of the Law of Defamation II, 4 Columbia Law Review, 1904, 33, 33.
Willnat L., Perceptions of Foreign Media Influence in Asia and Europe: The Third-Person Effect and Media Imperialism, 2002, 14(2).
Yatar E.K.M., Defamation, Privacy, and the Changing Social Status of Homosexuality: Re-Thinking Supreme Court Gay Rights Jurisprudence, 12 Law & Sexuality, 2003, 119.
Zimmerman D.L., Curbing the High Price of Loose Talk, 18(2) UC Davis Law Review, 1985, 359.
Zimmermann R., Whittaker S., Good Faith in European Contract Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, 87.
https://www.anwalt.org/diffamierung/ [20.05.2025].
https://www.dahag.de/c/ratgeber/strafrecht/diffamierung [20.05.2025].
https://www.justifit.fr/b/guides/droit-penal/diffamation/ [20.05.2025].
https://www.laloi.ca/quest-ce-que-de-la-diffamation/ [20.05.2025].
https://matsne.gov.ge/ka/document/view/33208?publication=7 [20.05.2025].
https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/cases/bladet-tromso-and-stensaas-v-norway/ [20.05.2025].
http://www.gccc.ge [20.05.2025].
https://temida.ge/fullcase/2691/--.pbn [20.05.2025].
https://www.supremecourt.ge/files/upload-file/pdf/ganmarteba7.pdf [20.05.2025].
https://www.supremecourt.ge/files/upload-file/pdf/ganmarteba7.pdf [20.05.2025].
https://www.supremecourt.ge/files/upload-file/pdf/dichand-and-others-v.-austria.pdf[20.05.2025].
https://www.supremecourt.ge/files/upload-file/pdf/ganmarteba7.pdf [20.05.2025].
https://temida.ge/fullcase/2944/--.pbn [20.05.2025].
https://temida.ge/fullcase/3826/--.pbn [20.05.2025].
https://temida.ge/fullcase/2893/--.pbn [20.05.2025].
https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/cases/bladet-tromso-and-stensaas-v-norway/ [20.05.2025].
https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/cases/bladet-tromso-and-stensaas-v-norway/ [20.05.2025].
https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/cases/case-of-kasabova-v-bulgaria/ [20.05.2025].
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-61861%22]} [20.05.2025]
https://www.zmogausteisiugidas.lt/en/case-law/tolstoy-miloslavsky-v-the-united-kingdom [20.05.2025].
ჩამოტვირთვები
გამოქვეყნებული
როგორ უნდა ციტირება
გამოცემა
სექცია
ლიცენზია
ეს ნამუშევარი ლიცენზირებულია Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 საერთაშორისო ლიცენზიით .
