Inclusive Education Under Ableism: Policy, Comparative Analysis of Practice and Legislation between Georgia and Following the Example of Europe
Keywords:
Person with disabilities; person with special educational needs; inclusive education; ableism; legislation.Abstract
The article reviews the state of inclusive education under ableism and explores how social stigma, structural barriers, and institutional discrimination affect the access to and outcomes of education for students with disabilities. The paper is based on a comparative analysis of the practice and legislation of Georgia and European countries, which makes it possible to identify both common trends and contextual differences in the implementation of inclusive education.
The example of European countries shows that the success of inclusive education depends on the presence of systemic approaches: multi-level support, early intervention, sustainable resource allocation, continuous professional development of teachers and strengthening public awareness. The above analysis shows that overcoming ableism in EU countries is considered not only a matter of legal regulations, but also a broad socio-cultural change, which includes reducing stigma, integrating education and social policies, and effective models of financing the individual needs of students.
Georgian legislation formally complies with international standards, however, its implementation in practice is often fragmented and depends on the individual capabilities of schools and local governments.
The article covers the definition and origins of ableism. It combines theoretical analysis of ableism, comparative policy research and assessment of practical experiences, which provides a complex picture of systemic barriers to inclusive education. The comparative perspective allows the researcher to identify not only existing gaps, but also strategic directions that Georgia can adopt from successful European models - starting with new formats of financial and administrative support, ending with public awareness-raising programs.
Strengthening inclusive education in Georgia requires reducing both social and institutional manifestations of ableism; evidence-based policies; a systematic model of professional development for specialists; intersectoral cooperation; and an educational environment that not only formally recognizes diversity, but also actually provides equal opportunities for all students. The recommendations presented in the article are aimed at precisely these strategic changes and reflect the best practices of modern European approaches, the adaptation of which in the Georgian education system will be a significant step forward towards inclusive, fair, and barrier-free education.
References
1. Constitution of Georgia, 24/08/1995, matsne.gov.ge/ka/document/view/30346?publication=36 [08.05.2026] (in Georgian).
2. Organic Law of Georgia "Labor Code of Georgia", Tbilisi, 29/09/2020,matsne.gov.ge/document/view/1155567?publication=17 [08.05.2026] (in Georgian).
3. Criminal Code of Georgia, 22/07/1999,matsne.gov.ge/document/view/16426?publication=284 [08.05.2026] (in Georgian).
4. Law of Georgia "On General Education", Tbilisi, 08/04/2005,https://mes.gov.ge/uploads/Licenzireba/kanoni%20zogadi%20ganatlebis%20shesaxeb.pdf [08.05.2026] (in Georgian).
5. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, 13/12/2006 (ratified in Georgia on 12/04/2014),https://matsne.gov.ge/ka/document/view/2334289?publication=0 [08.05.2026] (in Georgian).
6. Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, General Comment No. 6,https://www.ombudsman.ge/res/docs/2019110511405646434.pdf [08.05.2026] (in Georgian).
7. European Convention on Human Rights, 04/11/1950,https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/convention_kat [08.05.2026].
8. Unified Strategy of Education and Science of Georgia 2017-2021, Tbilisi, Ministry of Education and Science of Georgia, 2017,https://mes.gov.ge/uploads/MESStrategy_2017-2021.pdf [08.05.2026] (in Georgian).
9. Makalathia T., Basiladze N., Teachers Dependencies Inclusive Education Towards In Georgia, International Journal of Inclusive Education,Vol. 23, №5, 2019, 45-52 (in Georgian).
10. Tabatadze Sh., Gorgodze S., Education System In Georgia, TB., CCIIR, 2017 (in Georgian).
11. Chanturia G., Chincharauli T., Inclusive Education In Georgia: Current Trends And Challenges, TB., Ilya State University, 2015 (in Georgian).
12. EU Strategy on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021–2030, Brussels, European Commission, 03/03/2021, https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/disability/enhancing-strategy-rights-persons-disabilities-2030_en [08.05.2026].
13. Decree-Law No. 54/2018, Presidency of the Council of Ministers, Article 1-3, Lisbon, 06/07/2018, https://www.dge.mec.pt/sites/default/files/EEspecial/dl_54_2018_en_version_dge.pdf [08.05.2026].
14. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, 26/10/2012, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012P/TXT [08.05.2026].
15. Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, General Comment No. 2, 22/05/2014, https://docs.un.org/en/CRPD/C/GC/2 [08.05.2026].
16. Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, General Comment No. 1, 19/05/2014, https://docs.un.org/en/CRPD/C/GC/1 [08.05.2026].
17. Barnes C., Mercer G., Exploring Disability: A Sociological Introduction, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2010.
18. Björn P. M., Aro M., Koponen T., Fuchs L. S., Fuchs D., The Manyfaces of Special Education Within RTI Frameworks in the United States and Finland, Learning Disability Quarterly, Vol. 39, №1, 2016, 58-60, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0731948715594787 [08.05.2026].
19. Campbell F. K., Contours of Ableism: The Production of Disability and Abledness, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
20. Canevaro A., by Anna L., The Historical Evolution of School Integration in Italy: Some Witnesses and Considerations, Alter - European Journal of Disability Research, Vol. 4, №3, 2010, 203-208, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alter.2010.02.007 [08.05.2026].
21. Hattie J., Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement, London, Routledge, 2009.
22. Ianes D., Demo H., Zambotti F., Integration and Inclusion in Italy: The Actual Situation and Future Prospects, Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, Vol. 13, №1, 2014, 35-39, https://connect.springerpub.com/content/sgrjcep/13/1 [08.05.2026].
23. Lawson A., Disability and Equality Law in Britain, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2008.
24. Malinen O. P., Savolainen H., Xu J., Beijing In-service Teachers’ Self-efficacy and Attitudes Towards Inclusive Education, Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 28, №4, 2012, 526–534, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0742051X11001569 [08.05.2026].
25. Norwich B., Changing Policy and Legislation and Its Effects on Inclusive Education: A Perspective From England, British Journal of Special Education, Vol. 41, №4, 2014, 403–425, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8578.12079 [08.05.2026].
26. OECD, Sickness, Disability and Work: Breaking the Barriers, Paris, OECD Publishing, 2010.
27. Oliver M., The Politics of Disablement, London, Macmillan Education, 1990.
28. Oliver M., The Politics of Disablement (Online Version), London, Macmillan Education, 1990, https://www.scribd.com/document/740879802/The-Politics-of-Disablement [08.05.2026].
29. Oliver M., Barnes C., The New Politics of Disablement, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
30. Powell J. J. W., Barriers to Inclusion: Special Education in the United States and Germany, Boulder, Colorado, Paradigm Publishers, 2011.
31. Shakespeare T., Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited, London, Routledge, 2014.
32. UNESCO, A Guide for Ensuring Inclusion and Equity in Education, Paris, UNESCO Publishing, 2017, https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000248254 [08.05.2026].
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






