Agricultural Land as a Resource of Special Importance and Practical Aspects of Privatization

Shalva Kipshidze

doi:10.60131/jlaw.1.2025.9290

Authors

Shalva Kipshidze

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60131/jlaw.1.2025.9290

Keywords:

Ownership, Privatization, State property, Agricultural land, Electronic Auction, Privatization, Direct sale privatization.

Abstract

Article 19 of the Constitution of Georgia affirms and strengthens the universal right to ownership, including the rights to acquire, transfer, and inherit property. According to the Constitution, agricultural land is considered a resource of special importance. It may be owned only by the state, a self-governing unit, a citizen of Georgia, or an association of Georgian citizens. Exceptional cases can be defined by organic law.

The issue of foreign ownership of agricultural land remains a challenge in Georgia to this day. It has been the subject of multiple deliberations by the Constitutional Court, ultimately leading to constitutional amendments.

The purpose of this article is to examine the practical aspects of privatizing agricultural land as a resource of special importance. The study employs logical analysis and presents both informational and cognitive perspectives on the issue. It also discusses relevant legislation and comparative international experience.

Author Biography

Shalva Kipshidze

Lecturer at the Faculty of Law, Sulkhan-Saba Orbeliani University, specializing in Administrative Law, Entrepreneurial Regulation, and Privatization Law; Visiting Lecturer at the Faculty of Law, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University; Doctoral Candidate; Guest Trainer in Legal Studies at the LEPL – Training Center of Justice; Associate Researcher in Administrative Law at the Davit Batonishvili Institute of Law; Lead Specialist in the Privatization Department at the LEPL, National Agency of State Property, Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia, Lawyer.

References

Constitution of Georgia, 24/08/1995.

“On Agricultural Land Reform in the Republic of Georgia”, Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Georgia, N48, 18/01/1992 (Invalid 26/06/1997, No 786) (in Georgian).

Law of Georgia On the Structure, Authority, and Rules of Procedure of the Government of Georgia, 11 February 2004 (in Georgian).

Law of Georgia on State Property, 21/07/2010 (in Georgian).

Law of Georgia “On Ownership of Agricultural Land”, 25/06/2019 (in Georgian).

the Organic Law of Georgia on Agricultural Land Ownership, 25/05/2019 (in Georgian).

Law of Georgia on Determining the Purpose of Land and Sustainable Management of Agricultural Land, 25.06.2019 (in Georgian).

Resolution N265 of 29 May 2017 of the Government of Georgia "On the Approval of the State Program for the Rational Use of State-Owned Hayfields in High Regions" (in Georgian).

Resolution No. 77 of the Government of Georgia of February 14, 2018, “On Approval of the Regulations of the Government of Georgia” (in Georgian).

Bromley J. and Bromley D., Looking East: Reclaiming land and legacy in the former GDR, 2012, 63.

Ciaian P., Kancs D’A., Swinnen J., Van Herck K., Vranken L., Sales Market Regulations for Agricultural Land in EU Member States and Candidate Countries, Factor Markets, Working Paper, No. 14, February 2012, 15.

Christoph Rieger H., Die Privatisierung der Staatsunternehmen: Das Disinvestment-Desaster, 2001, 19.

Dells, K., Management and Privatization of State-Owned Agricultural Land – Case Studies from Eastern Germany and Ukraine. Conference paper for FIG/FAO/CNG Seminar in Verona, Italy, September 2008. 1-7.

Dixon M., Modern Land Law, 7th Ed., Routledge, 2010, 31.

Firtskhalashvili A., The Legal Dimension of the Social Function of Property, Journal of Constitutional Law, Issue No. 2/2022, p. 24. (in Georgian).

Goo SH., Sourcebook on Land Law, 3rd Ed., Cavendish Publishing, 2002, 42.

Himmelmann G., Politische Bestimmungsmerkmale der Privatisierungsdiskussion in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. In Privatisierung und die Zukunft der öffentlichen Wirtschaft, Baden-Baden: Nomos,1988, 107–176.

Kipshidze Sh., Privatization as a fundamental element of public administration, Zhurn. "Orbeliani", No. 4, 2021, 103 (in Georgian).

Kloepfer M., Verträge als Instrumente der Privatisierung, Liberalisierung und Regulierung in der Wasserwirtschaft, 2009, 31, 42.

Kornai J., Making the Transition to Private Ownership, F&D, 2000, 12-13.

Merkel W., Verstaatlichung, Privatisierung und Sozialdemokratie: ein westeuropäischer Vergleich, 1992, 252

Sack D., Vom Staat zum Markt, Privatisierung aus politikwissenschaftlicher Perspektive, 2019, 4-5.

Jennings R., Oppenheim’s International Law. London, 1992, 121.

World Bank, Innovations in Land Rigths Recognition, Administration and Governance, 2013, 195.

Decision N3/1/512 of 26 June 2012 of the Constitutional Court of Georgia on the case "Danish citizen Heike Chronicle v. the Parliament of Georgia".

Ruling N1/2/563 of 24 June 2014 of the Constitutional Court of Georgia on the case "Austrian citizen Matthias Hutter v. the Parliament of Georgia".

Decision No 1/6/666 of 22 June 2017 of the Constitutional Court of Georgia on the case "Citizen of Georgia Shota Jibladze v. the Parliament of Georgia", II, 13.

Ruling N3/10/1267,1268 of the Plenum of the Constitutional Court of Georgia of 7 December 2018 on the case “Greek citizen Prokopi Savvid and Diana Shamanidi v. the Parliament of Georgia”.

the detailed explanatory note to the Law on the Ownership of Agricultural Land "https://info.parliament.ge/file/1/BillReviewContent/214999 [06.03.2025].

https://www.bvvg.de/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Zahlen_und_Fakten_2023.pdf [08.03.2025].

https://www.safer.fr/les-safer/quest-ce-quune-safer/ [08.03.2025].

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ%3AC%3A2017%3A350%3AFULL#ntr5-C_2017350EN.01000501-E0005 [08.03.2025].