Annulment of an Individual Administrative-Legal Act by the Court Without Resolving the Disputed Issue and Ordering the Issuance of a New Act – An Effective Means of Protecting the Rights of the Interested Party?

Authors

  • Khatuna Loria
  • Tatia Barakadze

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60131/jlaw.1.2025.9289

Keywords:

Inquisitorial Nature, Adversarial Principle, Administrative Proceedings, Discretionary Authority, Annulment of an Act.

Abstract

In a modern democratic legal state, the development of effective mechanisms for the protection of human rights and their practical implementation remains a challenge, which is unimaginable without the active intervention of the court as a controlling body. Such intervention is particularly important when the legality of administrative measures is reviewed through administrative bodies, and a person requests the protection of their rights and the restoration of justice.

As the dispute takes place between two unequal subjects and balance is the cornerstone of making a true and fair decision, this article discusses the role of the court in administrative proceedings, the expression of the inquisitorial principle, and when an individual administrative-legal act is annulled without resolving the disputed issue. The validity and effectiveness of using this mechanism are also discussed. The mechanism offered by administrative procedural legislation is evaluated in terms of its sufficiency and as the only primary means of a fully justified guarantee for the subsequent protection of a person's legitimate interests and rights.

Author Biographies

Khatuna Loria

Associate Professor at the Faculty of Law of Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University.

Tatia Barakadze

PhD Student at the Faculty of Law of Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University.

References

Constitution of Georgia 24/08/1995.

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, 1950.

Universal Declaration of Human Rights, United Nations General Assembly, December 10, 1948.

Law of Georgia, Administrative Procedure Code of Georgia, 23/07/1999.

Law of Georgia, General Administrative Code of Georgia, 25/06/1999.

Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part signed on 27 June 2014. Ratified by the Parliament of Georgia on 18 July 2014. Entered into full force on 1 July 2016.

Gvaramadze T., “Fair Administrative Proceedings and European Standards”, Collection of Articles, Law Journal N2, Tbilisi, 2023 (In Georgian).

Kopaleishili M., Turava P., Kharshiladze I., Loria Kh., Gvaramadze T., Ghvamichava T., Handbook of Administrative Procedural Law, Tbilisi, 2018 (In Georgian).

Kopaleishvili M., Skhirtladze N., Kardava E., Turava P., Handbook of Administrative Procedural Law, Tbilisi, 2008 (In Georgian).

Loria V., Administrative Law of Georgia, Tbilisi, 2002 (In Georgian).

Turava P., Pirtskhalashvili A., Kardava E., Administrative Procedure in the Public Service”, Tbilisi, 2020 (In Georgian).

Kurdadze Sh., The Essence of Simplified Proceedings in Civil Procedure, Journal, “Law”, No. 7-8, 2002 (In Georgian).

Ghvamichava T., Admissibility of cassation appeal in administrative proceedings (comparative analysis), dissertation, Tbilisi, 2017 (In Georgian).

Tskhadadze K., “Relevance of Constitutional-Legal Principles for Administrative Law”, Administrative Law, Scientific Popular Journal, Tbilisi, 2016 (In Georgian).

Guidelines on Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, samartliani-sasamartlo-ganxilvis-upleba(samoqalaqo).pdf (supremecourt.ge) (In Georgian).

Decision of the Supreme Court of Georgia of July 24, 2024, case #ბს-260(კ-24) (In Georgian).

Ruling of the Supreme Court of Georgia of April 17, 2024, case #ბს-546(კ-23) (In Georgian).

Ruling of the Supreme Court of Georgia of March 18, 2024, case #ბს-1240(კ-23); (In Georgian.)

Decision of the Administrative Cases Chamber of the Supreme Court of Georgia of December 2, 2024 case #ბს-303-299(კ-14) (In Georgian).

Ruling of the Supreme Court of Georgia of September 18, 2023, case #ბს-466(კ-22); (In Georgian).

Ruling of the Supreme Court of Georgia of June 22, 2023, case #ბს-883(2კ-20) (In Georgian).

Judgment of the Supreme Court of Georgia of February 26, 2020, case #ბს-1389(კს-19) (In Georgian).

Decision of the Supreme Court of Georgia of November 8, 2018, case #ბს-602-602(2კ-18) (In Georgian).

Ruling of the Supreme Court of Georgia of October 2, 2018, case #ბს-1182-1176(2კ-17) (In Georgian).

Decision of the Supreme Court of Georgia of December 13, 2018, case #ბს-681-681(კ-18) (In Georgian).

Decision of the Supreme Court of Georgia of September 23, 2014, case #ბს-246-243(კ-14) (In Georgian).

Decision of the Constitutional Court of Georgia of August 27, 2009, No. 1/2/434, in the case - Public Defender of Georgia vs. Parliament of Georgia (In Georgian).

Decision of the Constitutional Court of Georgia of June 28, 2010, No. 1/466 in the case “Public Defender of Georgia vs. Parliament of Georgia” (In Georgian).

Decision of the Constitutional Court of Georgia of December 19, 2008 #1/1/403,427 Canadian citizen Hussein Ali and Georgian citizen Elene Kirakosyan against the Parliament of Georgia. (In Georgian).

https://www.humanrightsguide.ge/rights/samartliani-sasamartlos-upleba [25.03.2025] (In Georgian).

https://www.supremecourt.ge/files/upload-file/pdf/aqtebi3.pdf [25.03.2025] (In Georgian).

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Loria, K., & Barakadze, T. (2025). Annulment of an Individual Administrative-Legal Act by the Court Without Resolving the Disputed Issue and Ordering the Issuance of a New Act – An Effective Means of Protecting the Rights of the Interested Party?. Journal of Law , (1), 407–424 (Geo). https://doi.org/10.60131/jlaw.1.2025.9289

Issue

Section

Articles